Discussion:
MINNEAPOLIS BRIDGE DISASTER! The "Hero of New Orleans" To Head To Minnesota ... Uh, Soon!
(too old to reply)
Hugh Bychakakov
2007-08-02 23:27:02 UTC
Permalink
With his handlers cautiously, stealthily getting a feel for the mood
in Minneapolis prior to Bush's planned trip there
this Saturday(!) "to inspect the bridge disaster," Secret Service
operatives -- perhaps recalling the hateful, anti-Kennedy attitude
among Texans that accompanied the president's fateful, ill-advised
trip there in 1963 -- want to ensure as best they can that your White
House war criminal isn't met with ear-piercing boos and jeers as he
tries to play the "comforting father" role.

But with Katrina victims still suffering terribly after two years,
Bushie's speechwriters are working overtime to craft remarks that
might not seem to ingenuous. If that's at all possible, owning to
your Nincompoop-in-Chief's abysmal approval ratings.

The fact that Dumbya is going to Minnesota Saturday instead of earlier
is an indication that provisions will be made to keep protesters and
other administration-haters away from where he's to appear in that
Democratic stronghold.

As of this writing, Laura Bush is already on her way to Minneapolis.
She's not likely to be booed, however, and her presence will help the
Bushies gauge the leval of residents' hostility toward the worst
"president" in the history of the United States.

But it figures that if anyone can gain solace from a Bush visit, they
probably can also benefit from a lobotomy.
Red
2007-08-03 00:03:48 UTC
Permalink
Bullshit deleted.

What kind of whiny babies are these liberal idiots? They want the
POTUS to have his finger in every pie and his hand patting every back
so that they can blame every negative incident on him. Yet, when POTUS
tries to spy on terrorists and gangsters, they cry that their freedom
is being infringed. Do they want a Nanny state or a free state, or
does it depend on if POTUS is riding an elephant or a jackasss.
Bush President of Iraq
2007-08-03 00:57:22 UTC
Permalink
Post by Red
Bullshit deleted.
What kind of whiny babies are these liberal idiots? They want the
POTUS to have his finger in every pie and his hand patting every back
so that they can blame every negative incident on him. Yet, when POTUS
tries to spy on terrorists and gangsters, they cry that their freedom
is being infringed. Do they want a Nanny state or a free state, or
does it depend on if POTUS is riding an elephant or a jackasss.
Hey, Bush offered $5 million of our tax money to Minnesota.
That's 2 seconds of money to Iraq.
Myal
2007-08-03 03:59:32 UTC
Permalink
Post by Bush President of Iraq
Post by Red
Bullshit deleted.
What kind of whiny babies are these liberal idiots? They want the
POTUS to have his finger in every pie and his hand patting every back
so that they can blame every negative incident on him. Yet, when POTUS
tries to spy on terrorists and gangsters, they cry that their freedom
is being infringed. Do they want a Nanny state or a free state, or
does it depend on if POTUS is riding an elephant or a jackasss.
Hey, Bush offered $5 million of our tax money to Minnesota.
That's 2 seconds of money to Iraq.
bush owns america , he dont own iraq .. yet , when he does , he will be
throwing money and lives someplace else ... anywhere but where its gunna
put a stop to potential election winning moves , live revamping infra
structure ... ya gots to save that unimportant shit for when it matters
, like election time , and not use it all up at once , or its wasting a
resource .. get more elections / mileage out of soemthing so simple and
win more votes per life lost
Too_Many_Tools
2007-08-03 02:01:10 UTC
Permalink
Post by Red
Bullshit deleted.
What kind of whiny babies are these liberal idiots? They want the
POTUS to have his finger in every pie and his hand patting every back
so that they can blame every negative incident on him. Yet, when POTUS
tries to spy on terrorists and gangsters, they cry that their freedom
is being infringed. Do they want a Nanny state or a free state, or
does it depend on if POTUS is riding an elephant or a jackasss.
Actually his comments are more true than you want to admit.

Any politician visit is carefully orchestrated...especially a
President's...and especially a President's whose popularity is at
RECORD LOWS.....especially during an election cycle for the White
House.

And of course with the BILLIONS being wasted in Iraq instead of being
used to rebuild infrastructure in the United States, President Bush is
very guilty in contributing to this disaster.

Yeah I know it's tough when a President is actually held accountable
for his mistakes.

TMT
Chris ®
2007-08-03 02:15:46 UTC
Permalink
Post by Too_Many_Tools
Yeah I know it's tough when a President is
actually held accountable for his mistakes.
Especially ones made before he was elected. It sucks when you can't
blame the president you hate because logic deems it ridiculous.

--
"Whatever you do, don't stick your head in the oven" - Keith Hernandez,
on how to end a batting slump
Red
2007-08-03 02:41:50 UTC
Permalink
Post by Too_Many_Tools
Post by Red
Bullshit deleted.
What kind of whiny babies are these liberal idiots? They want the
POTUS to have his finger in every pie and his hand patting every back
so that they can blame every negative incident on him. Yet, when POTUS
tries to spy on terrorists and gangsters, they cry that their freedom
is being infringed. Do they want a Nanny state or a free state, or
does it depend on if POTUS is riding an elephant or a jackasss.
Actually his comments are more true than you want to admit.
Any politician visit is carefully orchestrated...especially a
President's...and especially a President's whose popularity is at
RECORD LOWS.....especially during an election cycle for the White
House.
And of course with the BILLIONS being wasted in Iraq instead of being
used to rebuild infrastructure in the United States, President Bush is
very guilty in contributing to this disaster.
Yeah I know it's tough when a President is actually held accountable
for his mistakes.
TMT
Nanny or Free?
Bob Brock
2007-08-03 03:05:46 UTC
Permalink
Post by Red
Post by Too_Many_Tools
Post by Red
Bullshit deleted.
What kind of whiny babies are these liberal idiots? They want the
POTUS to have his finger in every pie and his hand patting every back
so that they can blame every negative incident on him. Yet, when POTUS
tries to spy on terrorists and gangsters, they cry that their freedom
is being infringed. Do they want a Nanny state or a free state, or
does it depend on if POTUS is riding an elephant or a jackasss.
Actually his comments are more true than you want to admit.
Any politician visit is carefully orchestrated...especially a
President's...and especially a President's whose popularity is at
RECORD LOWS.....especially during an election cycle for the White
House.
And of course with the BILLIONS being wasted in Iraq instead of being
used to rebuild infrastructure in the United States, President Bush is
very guilty in contributing to this disaster.
Yeah I know it's tough when a President is actually held accountable
for his mistakes.
TMT
Nanny or Free?
Accountable or not?
Red
2007-08-03 13:36:47 UTC
Permalink
Post by Red
Post by Too_Many_Tools
Post by Red
Bullshit deleted.
What kind of whiny babies are these liberal idiots? They want the
POTUS to have his finger in every pie and his hand patting every back
so that they can blame every negative incident on him. Yet, when POTUS
tries to spy on terrorists and gangsters, they cry that their freedom
is being infringed. Do they want a Nanny state or a free state, or
does it depend on if POTUS is riding an elephant or a jackasss.
Actually his comments are more true than you want to admit.
Any politician visit is carefully orchestrated...especially a
President's...and especially a President's whose popularity is at
RECORD LOWS.....especially during an election cycle for the White
House.
And of course with the BILLIONS being wasted in Iraq instead of being
used to rebuild infrastructure in the United States, President Bush is
very guilty in contributing to this disaster.
Yeah I know it's tough when a President is actually held accountable
for his mistakes.
TMT
Nanny or Free?
Accountable or not?- Hide quoted text -
- Show quoted text -
The ones that should be accountable are the ones that recently
inspected it and passed it. Not Bush or Pawlenty. Gimme a fucking
break already.
Bob Brock
2007-08-03 13:38:59 UTC
Permalink
Post by Red
Post by Red
Post by Too_Many_Tools
Post by Red
Bullshit deleted.
What kind of whiny babies are these liberal idiots? They want the
POTUS to have his finger in every pie and his hand patting every back
so that they can blame every negative incident on him. Yet, when POTUS
tries to spy on terrorists and gangsters, they cry that their freedom
is being infringed. Do they want a Nanny state or a free state, or
does it depend on if POTUS is riding an elephant or a jackasss.
Actually his comments are more true than you want to admit.
Any politician visit is carefully orchestrated...especially a
President's...and especially a President's whose popularity is at
RECORD LOWS.....especially during an election cycle for the White
House.
And of course with the BILLIONS being wasted in Iraq instead of being
used to rebuild infrastructure in the United States, President Bush is
very guilty in contributing to this disaster.
Yeah I know it's tough when a President is actually held accountable
for his mistakes.
TMT
Nanny or Free?
Accountable or not?- Hide quoted text -
- Show quoted text -
The ones that should be accountable are the ones that recently
inspected it and passed it. Not Bush or Pawlenty. Gimme a fucking
break already.
It was an Interstate highway. Interstate highways are federal roads. Are
you implying that the federal government is not responsible of letting their
own bridges deteriote to the point of collapse?

Give yourself a fucking break. They decided it was better to spend the
money somewhere else.
h***@hotmail.com
2007-08-03 22:06:28 UTC
Permalink
Post by Bob Brock
Post by Red
Post by Red
Post by Too_Many_Tools
Post by Red
Bullshit deleted.
What kind of whiny babies are these liberal idiots? They want the
POTUS to have his finger in every pie and his hand patting every back
so that they can blame every negative incident on him. Yet, when POTUS
tries to spy on terrorists and gangsters, they cry that their freedom
is being infringed. Do they want a Nanny state or a free state, or
does it depend on if POTUS is riding an elephant or a jackasss.
Actually his comments are more true than you want to admit.
Any politician visit is carefully orchestrated...especially a
President's...and especially a President's whose popularity is at
RECORD LOWS.....especially during an election cycle for the White
House.
And of course with the BILLIONS being wasted in Iraq instead of being
used to rebuild infrastructure in the United States, President Bush is
very guilty in contributing to this disaster.
Yeah I know it's tough when a President is actually held accountable
for his mistakes.
TMT
Nanny or Free?
Accountable or not?- Hide quoted text -
- Show quoted text -
The ones that should be accountable are the ones that recently
inspected it and passed it. Not Bush or Pawlenty. Gimme a fucking
break already.
It was an Interstate highway. Interstate highways are federal roads. Are
you implying that the federal government is not responsible of letting their
own bridges deteriote to the point of collapse?
Give yourself a fucking break. They decided it was better to spend the
money somewhere else.
Today's Headline: Bridge Falls Down; Impeach Bush!
Bob Brock
2007-08-03 22:09:31 UTC
Permalink
Post by h***@hotmail.com
Post by Bob Brock
Post by Red
Post by Red
Post by Too_Many_Tools
Post by Red
Bullshit deleted.
What kind of whiny babies are these liberal idiots? They want the
POTUS to have his finger in every pie and his hand patting every back
so that they can blame every negative incident on him. Yet, when POTUS
tries to spy on terrorists and gangsters, they cry that their freedom
is being infringed. Do they want a Nanny state or a free state, or
does it depend on if POTUS is riding an elephant or a jackasss.
Actually his comments are more true than you want to admit.
Any politician visit is carefully orchestrated...especially a
President's...and especially a President's whose popularity is at
RECORD LOWS.....especially during an election cycle for the White
House.
And of course with the BILLIONS being wasted in Iraq instead of being
used to rebuild infrastructure in the United States, President Bush is
very guilty in contributing to this disaster.
Yeah I know it's tough when a President is actually held accountable
for his mistakes.
TMT
Nanny or Free?
Accountable or not?- Hide quoted text -
- Show quoted text -
The ones that should be accountable are the ones that recently
inspected it and passed it. Not Bush or Pawlenty. Gimme a fucking
break already.
It was an Interstate highway. Interstate highways are federal roads.
Are
you implying that the federal government is not responsible of letting their
own bridges deteriote to the point of collapse?
Give yourself a fucking break. They decided it was better to spend the
money somewhere else.
Today's Headline: Bridge Falls Down; Impeach Bush!
Only in your head, but you are a headcase afterall.
h***@hotmail.com
2007-08-03 22:14:00 UTC
Permalink
Post by Bob Brock
Post by h***@hotmail.com
Post by Bob Brock
Post by Red
Post by Red
Post by Too_Many_Tools
Post by Red
Bullshit deleted.
What kind of whiny babies are these liberal idiots? They want the
POTUS to have his finger in every pie and his hand patting every back
so that they can blame every negative incident on him. Yet, when
POTUS
tries to spy on terrorists and gangsters, they cry that their freedom
is being infringed. Do they want a Nanny state or a free state, or
does it depend on if POTUS is riding an elephant or a jackasss.
Actually his comments are more true than you want to admit.
Any politician visit is carefully orchestrated...especially a
President's...and especially a President's whose popularity is at
RECORD LOWS.....especially during an election cycle for the White
House.
And of course with the BILLIONS being wasted in Iraq instead of being
used to rebuild infrastructure in the United States, President Bush is
very guilty in contributing to this disaster.
Yeah I know it's tough when a President is actually held accountable
for his mistakes.
TMT
Nanny or Free?
Accountable or not?- Hide quoted text -
- Show quoted text -
The ones that should be accountable are the ones that recently
inspected it and passed it. Not Bush or Pawlenty. Gimme a fucking
break already.
It was an Interstate highway. Interstate highways are federal roads.
Are
you implying that the federal government is not responsible of letting their
own bridges deteriote to the point of collapse?
Give yourself a fucking break. They decided it was better to spend the
money somewhere else.
Today's Headline: Bridge Falls Down; Impeach Bush!
Only in your head, but you are a headcase afterall.
Nope. That's exactly where you were going with it.
Bob Brock
2007-08-03 22:19:05 UTC
Permalink
Post by h***@hotmail.com
Post by Bob Brock
Post by h***@hotmail.com
Post by Bob Brock
Post by Red
Post by Red
Post by Too_Many_Tools
Post by Red
Bullshit deleted.
What kind of whiny babies are these liberal idiots? They want the
POTUS to have his finger in every pie and his hand patting
every
back
so that they can blame every negative incident on him. Yet, when
POTUS
tries to spy on terrorists and gangsters, they cry that their
freedom
is being infringed. Do they want a Nanny state or a free
state,
or
does it depend on if POTUS is riding an elephant or a jackasss.
Actually his comments are more true than you want to admit.
Any politician visit is carefully orchestrated...especially a
President's...and especially a President's whose popularity is at
RECORD LOWS.....especially during an election cycle for the White
House.
And of course with the BILLIONS being wasted in Iraq instead of being
used to rebuild infrastructure in the United States, President
Bush
is
very guilty in contributing to this disaster.
Yeah I know it's tough when a President is actually held accountable
for his mistakes.
TMT
Nanny or Free?
Accountable or not?- Hide quoted text -
- Show quoted text -
The ones that should be accountable are the ones that recently
inspected it and passed it. Not Bush or Pawlenty. Gimme a fucking
break already.
It was an Interstate highway. Interstate highways are federal roads.
Are
you implying that the federal government is not responsible of letting their
own bridges deteriote to the point of collapse?
Give yourself a fucking break. They decided it was better to spend the
money somewhere else.
Today's Headline: Bridge Falls Down; Impeach Bush!
Only in your head, but you are a headcase afterall.
Nope. That's exactly where you were going with it.
No, you're full of shit, but that's nothing new.
h***@hotmail.com
2007-08-04 01:27:47 UTC
Permalink
Post by Bob Brock
Post by h***@hotmail.com
Post by Bob Brock
Post by h***@hotmail.com
Post by Bob Brock
Post by Red
Post by Red
Post by Too_Many_Tools
Post by Red
Bullshit deleted.
What kind of whiny babies are these liberal idiots? They want
the
POTUS to have his finger in every pie and his hand patting
every
back
so that they can blame every negative incident on him. Yet,
when
POTUS
tries to spy on terrorists and gangsters, they cry that their
freedom
is being infringed. Do they want a Nanny state or a free
state,
or
does it depend on if POTUS is riding an elephant or a jackasss.
Actually his comments are more true than you want to admit.
Any politician visit is carefully orchestrated...especially a
President's...and especially a President's whose popularity is at
RECORD LOWS.....especially during an election cycle for the White
House.
And of course with the BILLIONS being wasted in Iraq instead of
being
used to rebuild infrastructure in the United States, President
Bush
is
very guilty in contributing to this disaster.
Yeah I know it's tough when a President is actually held
accountable
for his mistakes.
TMT
Nanny or Free?
Accountable or not?- Hide quoted text -
- Show quoted text -
The ones that should be accountable are the ones that recently
inspected it and passed it. Not Bush or Pawlenty. Gimme a fucking
break already.
It was an Interstate highway. Interstate highways are federal roads.
Are
you implying that the federal government is not responsible of letting their
own bridges deteriote to the point of collapse?
Give yourself a fucking break. They decided it was better to spend the
money somewhere else.
Today's Headline: Bridge Falls Down; Impeach Bush!
Only in your head, but you are a headcase afterall.
Nope. That's exactly where you were going with it.
No, you're full of shit, but that's nothing new.
In another thread, you indicated that you have no problem lying. I
believed you then.
Bob Brock
2007-08-04 01:38:00 UTC
Permalink
Post by h***@hotmail.com
Post by Bob Brock
Post by h***@hotmail.com
Post by Bob Brock
Post by h***@hotmail.com
Post by Bob Brock
Post by Red
Post by Red
Post by Too_Many_Tools
Post by Red
Bullshit deleted.
What kind of whiny babies are these liberal idiots? They want
the
POTUS to have his finger in every pie and his hand patting
every
back
so that they can blame every negative incident on him. Yet,
when
POTUS
tries to spy on terrorists and gangsters, they cry that their
freedom
is being infringed. Do they want a Nanny state or a free
state,
or
does it depend on if POTUS is riding an elephant or a
jackasss.
Actually his comments are more true than you want to admit.
Any politician visit is carefully orchestrated...especially a
President's...and especially a President's whose popularity
is
at
RECORD LOWS.....especially during an election cycle for the White
House.
And of course with the BILLIONS being wasted in Iraq instead of
being
used to rebuild infrastructure in the United States, President
Bush
is
very guilty in contributing to this disaster.
Yeah I know it's tough when a President is actually held
accountable
for his mistakes.
TMT
Nanny or Free?
Accountable or not?- Hide quoted text -
- Show quoted text -
The ones that should be accountable are the ones that recently
inspected it and passed it. Not Bush or Pawlenty. Gimme a fucking
break already.
It was an Interstate highway. Interstate highways are federal roads.
Are
you implying that the federal government is not responsible of
letting
their
own bridges deteriote to the point of collapse?
Give yourself a fucking break. They decided it was better to spend the
money somewhere else.
Today's Headline: Bridge Falls Down; Impeach Bush!
Only in your head, but you are a headcase afterall.
Nope. That's exactly where you were going with it.
No, you're full of shit, but that's nothing new.
In another thread, you indicated that you have no problem lying. I
believed you then.
I was simply trying to help you put your ass where your mouth is. You're
still full of shit.
h***@hotmail.com
2007-08-04 17:42:34 UTC
Permalink
Post by Bob Brock
Post by h***@hotmail.com
Post by Bob Brock
Post by h***@hotmail.com
Post by Bob Brock
Post by h***@hotmail.com
Post by Bob Brock
Post by Red
Post by Red
Post by Too_Many_Tools
Post by Red
Bullshit deleted.
What kind of whiny babies are these liberal idiots? They
want
the
POTUS to have his finger in every pie and his hand patting
every
back
so that they can blame every negative incident on him. Yet,
when
POTUS
tries to spy on terrorists and gangsters, they cry that
their
freedom
is being infringed. Do they want a Nanny state or a free
state,
or
does it depend on if POTUS is riding an elephant or a
jackasss.
Actually his comments are more true than you want to admit.
Any politician visit is carefully orchestrated...especially a
President's...and especially a President's whose popularity
is
at
RECORD LOWS.....especially during an election cycle for the
White
House.
And of course with the BILLIONS being wasted in Iraq instead
of
being
used to rebuild infrastructure in the United States,
President
Bush
is
very guilty in contributing to this disaster.
Yeah I know it's tough when a President is actually held
accountable
for his mistakes.
TMT
Nanny or Free?
Accountable or not?- Hide quoted text -
- Show quoted text -
The ones that should be accountable are the ones that recently
inspected it and passed it. Not Bush or Pawlenty. Gimme a fucking
break already.
It was an Interstate highway. Interstate highways are federal roads.
Are
you implying that the federal government is not responsible of
letting
their
own bridges deteriote to the point of collapse?
Give yourself a fucking break. They decided it was better to spend the
money somewhere else.
Today's Headline: Bridge Falls Down; Impeach Bush!
Only in your head, but you are a headcase afterall.
Nope. That's exactly where you were going with it.
No, you're full of shit, but that's nothing new.
In another thread, you indicated that you have no problem lying. I
believed you then.
I was simply trying to help you put your ass where your mouth is. You're
still full of shit.-
And you're still full of lies.
Bob Brock
2007-08-04 17:43:47 UTC
Permalink
Post by h***@hotmail.com
Post by Bob Brock
Post by h***@hotmail.com
Post by Bob Brock
Post by h***@hotmail.com
Post by Bob Brock
Post by h***@hotmail.com
Post by Bob Brock
Post by Red
On Aug 2, 10:01?pm, Too_Many_Tools
Post by Too_Many_Tools
Post by Red
Bullshit deleted.
What kind of whiny babies are these liberal idiots? They
want
the
POTUS to have his finger in every pie and his hand
patting
every
back
so that they can blame every negative incident on him.
Yet,
when
POTUS
tries to spy on terrorists and gangsters, they cry that
their
freedom
is being infringed. Do they want a Nanny state or a free
state,
or
does it depend on if POTUS is riding an elephant or a
jackasss.
Actually his comments are more true than you want to admit.
Any politician visit is carefully
orchestrated...especially a
President's...and especially a President's whose popularity
is
at
RECORD LOWS.....especially during an election cycle for the
White
House.
And of course with the BILLIONS being wasted in Iraq
instead
of
being
used to rebuild infrastructure in the United States,
President
Bush
is
very guilty in contributing to this disaster.
Yeah I know it's tough when a President is actually held
accountable
for his mistakes.
TMT
Nanny or Free?
Accountable or not?- Hide quoted text -
- Show quoted text -
The ones that should be accountable are the ones that recently
inspected it and passed it. Not Bush or Pawlenty. Gimme a fucking
break already.
It was an Interstate highway. Interstate highways are federal roads.
Are
you implying that the federal government is not responsible of
letting
their
own bridges deteriote to the point of collapse?
Give yourself a fucking break. They decided it was better to
spend
the
money somewhere else.
Today's Headline: Bridge Falls Down; Impeach Bush!
Only in your head, but you are a headcase afterall.
Nope. That's exactly where you were going with it.
No, you're full of shit, but that's nothing new.
In another thread, you indicated that you have no problem lying. I
believed you then.
I was simply trying to help you put your ass where your mouth is. You're
still full of shit.-
And you're still full of lies.
I'm so upset, I think I'll go eat lunch with the wife now.

ROTFLMAO...
Red
2007-08-03 23:09:20 UTC
Permalink
Post by Bob Brock
Post by Red
Post by Red
Post by Too_Many_Tools
Post by Red
Bullshit deleted.
What kind of whiny babies are these liberal idiots? They want the
POTUS to have his finger in every pie and his hand patting every back
so that they can blame every negative incident on him. Yet, when POTUS
tries to spy on terrorists and gangsters, they cry that their freedom
is being infringed. Do they want a Nanny state or a free state, or
does it depend on if POTUS is riding an elephant or a jackasss.
Actually his comments are more true than you want to admit.
Any politician visit is carefully orchestrated...especially a
President's...and especially a President's whose popularity is at
RECORD LOWS.....especially during an election cycle for the White
House.
And of course with the BILLIONS being wasted in Iraq instead of being
used to rebuild infrastructure in the United States, President Bush is
very guilty in contributing to this disaster.
Yeah I know it's tough when a President is actually held accountable
for his mistakes.
TMT
Nanny or Free?
Accountable or not?- Hide quoted text -
- Show quoted text -
The ones that should be accountable are the ones that recently
inspected it and passed it. Not Bush or Pawlenty. Gimme a fucking
break already.
It was an Interstate highway. Interstate highways are federal roads. Are
you implying that the federal government is not responsible of letting their
own bridges deteriote to the point of collapse?
Give yourself a fucking break. They decided it was better to spend the
money somewhere else.
Today's Headline: Bridge Falls Down; Impeach Bush!- Hide quoted text -
- Show quoted text -
I forget, was Bush responsible for the Tsunami a few years back?
Bob Brock
2007-08-03 23:22:02 UTC
Permalink
Post by Red
Post by Bob Brock
Post by Red
Post by Red
Post by Too_Many_Tools
Post by Red
Bullshit deleted.
What kind of whiny babies are these liberal idiots? They want the
POTUS to have his finger in every pie and his hand patting
every
back
so that they can blame every negative incident on him. Yet,
when
POTUS
tries to spy on terrorists and gangsters, they cry that their freedom
is being infringed. Do they want a Nanny state or a free state, or
does it depend on if POTUS is riding an elephant or a jackasss.
Actually his comments are more true than you want to admit.
Any politician visit is carefully orchestrated...especially a
President's...and especially a President's whose popularity is at
RECORD LOWS.....especially during an election cycle for the White
House.
And of course with the BILLIONS being wasted in Iraq instead of being
used to rebuild infrastructure in the United States, President Bush is
very guilty in contributing to this disaster.
Yeah I know it's tough when a President is actually held accountable
for his mistakes.
TMT
Nanny or Free?
Accountable or not?- Hide quoted text -
- Show quoted text -
The ones that should be accountable are the ones that recently
inspected it and passed it. Not Bush or Pawlenty. Gimme a fucking
break already.
It was an Interstate highway. Interstate highways are federal roads.
Are
you implying that the federal government is not responsible of letting their
own bridges deteriote to the point of collapse?
Give yourself a fucking break. They decided it was better to spend the
money somewhere else.
Today's Headline: Bridge Falls Down; Impeach Bush!- Hide quoted text -
- Show quoted text -
I forget, was Bush responsible for the Tsunami a few years back?
He wasn't responsible for you loons. That responsibility belongs to your
mommas and whoever your daddy was.
Red
2007-08-03 23:29:13 UTC
Permalink
Post by Bob Brock
Post by Red
Post by Bob Brock
Post by Red
Post by Red
Post by Too_Many_Tools
Post by Red
Bullshit deleted.
What kind of whiny babies are these liberal idiots? They want the
POTUS to have his finger in every pie and his hand patting
every
back
so that they can blame every negative incident on him. Yet,
when
POTUS
tries to spy on terrorists and gangsters, they cry that their
freedom
is being infringed. Do they want a Nanny state or a free state,
or
does it depend on if POTUS is riding an elephant or a jackasss.
Actually his comments are more true than you want to admit.
Any politician visit is carefully orchestrated...especially a
President's...and especially a President's whose popularity is at
RECORD LOWS.....especially during an election cycle for the White
House.
And of course with the BILLIONS being wasted in Iraq instead of being
used to rebuild infrastructure in the United States, President
Bush is
very guilty in contributing to this disaster.
Yeah I know it's tough when a President is actually held accountable
for his mistakes.
TMT
Nanny or Free?
Accountable or not?- Hide quoted text -
- Show quoted text -
The ones that should be accountable are the ones that recently
inspected it and passed it. Not Bush or Pawlenty. Gimme a fucking
break already.
It was an Interstate highway. Interstate highways are federal roads.
Are
you implying that the federal government is not responsible of letting their
own bridges deteriote to the point of collapse?
Give yourself a fucking break. They decided it was better to spend the
money somewhere else.
Today's Headline: Bridge Falls Down; Impeach Bush!- Hide quoted text -
- Show quoted text -
I forget, was Bush responsible for the Tsunami a few years back?
He wasn't responsible for you loons. That responsibility belongs to your
mommas and whoever your daddy was.- Hide quoted text -
- Show quoted text -
Love me daddy, love me daddy!
Bob Brock
2007-08-03 23:30:39 UTC
Permalink
Post by Red
Post by Bob Brock
Post by Red
Post by Bob Brock
Post by Red
Post by Red
Post by Too_Many_Tools
Post by Red
Bullshit deleted.
What kind of whiny babies are these liberal idiots? They
want
the
POTUS to have his finger in every pie and his hand patting
every
back
so that they can blame every negative incident on him. Yet,
when
POTUS
tries to spy on terrorists and gangsters, they cry that their
freedom
is being infringed. Do they want a Nanny state or a free state,
or
does it depend on if POTUS is riding an elephant or a jackasss.
Actually his comments are more true than you want to admit.
Any politician visit is carefully orchestrated...especially a
President's...and especially a President's whose popularity is at
RECORD LOWS.....especially during an election cycle for the White
House.
And of course with the BILLIONS being wasted in Iraq instead
of
being
used to rebuild infrastructure in the United States, President
Bush is
very guilty in contributing to this disaster.
Yeah I know it's tough when a President is actually held
accountable
for his mistakes.
TMT
Nanny or Free?
Accountable or not?- Hide quoted text -
- Show quoted text -
The ones that should be accountable are the ones that recently
inspected it and passed it. Not Bush or Pawlenty. Gimme a fucking
break already.
It was an Interstate highway. Interstate highways are federal roads.
Are
you implying that the federal government is not responsible of
letting
their
own bridges deteriote to the point of collapse?
Give yourself a fucking break. They decided it was better to spend the
money somewhere else.
Today's Headline: Bridge Falls Down; Impeach Bush!- Hide quoted text -
- Show quoted text -
I forget, was Bush responsible for the Tsunami a few years back?
He wasn't responsible for you loons. That responsibility belongs to your
mommas and whoever your daddy was.- Hide quoted text -
- Show quoted text -
Love me daddy, love me daddy!
;-)
h***@hotmail.com
2007-08-04 01:31:01 UTC
Permalink
Post by Red
Post by Bob Brock
Post by Red
Post by Bob Brock
Post by Red
Post by Red
Post by Too_Many_Tools
Post by Red
Bullshit deleted.
What kind of whiny babies are these liberal idiots? They want
the
POTUS to have his finger in every pie and his hand patting
every
back
so that they can blame every negative incident on him. Yet,
when
POTUS
tries to spy on terrorists and gangsters, they cry that their
freedom
is being infringed. Do they want a Nanny state or a free state,
or
does it depend on if POTUS is riding an elephant or a jackasss.
Actually his comments are more true than you want to admit.
Any politician visit is carefully orchestrated...especially a
President's...and especially a President's whose popularity is at
RECORD LOWS.....especially during an election cycle for the White
House.
And of course with the BILLIONS being wasted in Iraq instead of
being
used to rebuild infrastructure in the United States, President
Bush is
very guilty in contributing to this disaster.
Yeah I know it's tough when a President is actually held
accountable
for his mistakes.
TMT
Nanny or Free?
Accountable or not?- Hide quoted text -
- Show quoted text -
The ones that should be accountable are the ones that recently
inspected it and passed it. Not Bush or Pawlenty. Gimme a fucking
break already.
It was an Interstate highway. Interstate highways are federal roads.
Are
you implying that the federal government is not responsible of letting their
own bridges deteriote to the point of collapse?
Give yourself a fucking break. They decided it was better to spend the
money somewhere else.
Today's Headline: Bridge Falls Down; Impeach Bush!- Hide quoted text -
- Show quoted text -
I forget, was Bush responsible for the Tsunami a few years back?
He wasn't responsible for you loons. That responsibility belongs to your
mommas and whoever your daddy was.- Hide quoted text -
- Show quoted text -
Love me daddy, love me daddy!
Aw, Geez! You just played right into one of his sick fantasies.
Bob Brock
2007-08-04 01:41:40 UTC
Permalink
Post by h***@hotmail.com
Post by Red
Post by Bob Brock
Post by Red
Post by Bob Brock
Post by Red
Post by Red
Post by Too_Many_Tools
Post by Red
Bullshit deleted.
What kind of whiny babies are these liberal idiots? They
want
the
POTUS to have his finger in every pie and his hand patting
every
back
so that they can blame every negative incident on him. Yet,
when
POTUS
tries to spy on terrorists and gangsters, they cry that
their
freedom
is being infringed. Do they want a Nanny state or a free
state,
or
does it depend on if POTUS is riding an elephant or a
jackasss.
Actually his comments are more true than you want to admit.
Any politician visit is carefully orchestrated...especially a
President's...and especially a President's whose popularity
is at
RECORD LOWS.....especially during an election cycle for the
White
House.
And of course with the BILLIONS being wasted in Iraq instead of
being
used to rebuild infrastructure in the United States, President
Bush is
very guilty in contributing to this disaster.
Yeah I know it's tough when a President is actually held
accountable
for his mistakes.
TMT
Nanny or Free?
Accountable or not?- Hide quoted text -
- Show quoted text -
The ones that should be accountable are the ones that recently
inspected it and passed it. Not Bush or Pawlenty. Gimme a fucking
break already.
It was an Interstate highway. Interstate highways are federal roads.
Are
you implying that the federal government is not responsible of
letting
their
own bridges deteriote to the point of collapse?
Give yourself a fucking break. They decided it was better to spend the
money somewhere else.
Today's Headline: Bridge Falls Down; Impeach Bush!- Hide quoted text -
- Show quoted text -
I forget, was Bush responsible for the Tsunami a few years back?
He wasn't responsible for you loons. That responsibility belongs to your
mommas and whoever your daddy was.- Hide quoted text -
- Show quoted text -
Love me daddy, love me daddy!
Aw, Geez! You just played right into one of his sick fantasies.
Nah, he's all right. You on the other hand are full of shit.
h***@hotmail.com
2007-08-04 17:44:13 UTC
Permalink
Post by Bob Brock
Post by h***@hotmail.com
Post by Red
Post by Bob Brock
Post by Red
Post by Bob Brock
Post by Red
Post by Red
Post by Too_Many_Tools
Post by Red
Bullshit deleted.
What kind of whiny babies are these liberal idiots? They
want
the
POTUS to have his finger in every pie and his hand patting
every
back
so that they can blame every negative incident on him.
Yet,
when
POTUS
tries to spy on terrorists and gangsters, they cry that
their
freedom
is being infringed. Do they want a Nanny state or a free
state,
or
does it depend on if POTUS is riding an elephant or a
jackasss.
Actually his comments are more true than you want to admit.
Any politician visit is carefully orchestrated...especially
a
President's...and especially a President's whose popularity
is at
RECORD LOWS.....especially during an election cycle for the
White
House.
And of course with the BILLIONS being wasted in Iraq instead
of
being
used to rebuild infrastructure in the United States,
President
Bush is
very guilty in contributing to this disaster.
Yeah I know it's tough when a President is actually held
accountable
for his mistakes.
TMT
Nanny or Free?
Accountable or not?- Hide quoted text -
- Show quoted text -
The ones that should be accountable are the ones that recently
inspected it and passed it. Not Bush or Pawlenty. Gimme a fucking
break already.
It was an Interstate highway. Interstate highways are federal roads.
Are
you implying that the federal government is not responsible of
letting
their
own bridges deteriote to the point of collapse?
Give yourself a fucking break. They decided it was better to spend the
money somewhere else.
Today's Headline: Bridge Falls Down; Impeach Bush!- Hide quoted text -
- Show quoted text -
I forget, was Bush responsible for the Tsunami a few years back?
He wasn't responsible for you loons. That responsibility belongs to your
mommas and whoever your daddy was.- Hide quoted text -
- Show quoted text -
Love me daddy, love me daddy!
Aw, Geez! You just played right into one of his sick fantasies.
Nah, he's all right.
I'll bet you think he's all right. Go get a room.
Post by Bob Brock
You on the other hand are full of shit.
And you're still full of lies.
Bob Brock
2007-08-04 17:47:03 UTC
Permalink
Post by h***@hotmail.com
Post by Bob Brock
Post by h***@hotmail.com
Post by Red
Post by Bob Brock
Post by Red
Post by Bob Brock
Post by Red
On Aug 2, 10:01?pm, Too_Many_Tools
Post by Too_Many_Tools
Post by Red
Bullshit deleted.
What kind of whiny babies are these liberal idiots?
They
want
the
POTUS to have his finger in every pie and his hand
patting
every
back
so that they can blame every negative incident on him.
Yet,
when
POTUS
tries to spy on terrorists and gangsters, they cry that
their
freedom
is being infringed. Do they want a Nanny state or a
free
state,
or
does it depend on if POTUS is riding an elephant or a
jackasss.
Actually his comments are more true than you want to
admit.
Any politician visit is carefully
orchestrated...especially
a
President's...and especially a President's whose
popularity
is at
RECORD LOWS.....especially during an election cycle for
the
White
House.
And of course with the BILLIONS being wasted in Iraq
instead
of
being
used to rebuild infrastructure in the United States,
President
Bush is
very guilty in contributing to this disaster.
Yeah I know it's tough when a President is actually held
accountable
for his mistakes.
TMT
Nanny or Free?
Accountable or not?- Hide quoted text -
- Show quoted text -
The ones that should be accountable are the ones that recently
inspected it and passed it. Not Bush or Pawlenty. Gimme a
fucking
break already.
It was an Interstate highway. Interstate highways are federal roads.
Are
you implying that the federal government is not responsible of
letting
their
own bridges deteriote to the point of collapse?
Give yourself a fucking break. They decided it was better to
spend the
money somewhere else.
Today's Headline: Bridge Falls Down; Impeach Bush!- Hide quoted text -
- Show quoted text -
I forget, was Bush responsible for the Tsunami a few years back?
He wasn't responsible for you loons. That responsibility belongs to your
mommas and whoever your daddy was.- Hide quoted text -
- Show quoted text -
Love me daddy, love me daddy!
Aw, Geez! You just played right into one of his sick fantasies.
Nah, he's all right.
I'll bet you think he's all right. Go get a room.
There you go with those homo fantasies again.
Post by h***@hotmail.com
Post by Bob Brock
You on the other hand are full of shit.
And you're still full of lies.
I've really got to go meet the wife for lunch. Show everyone what a real
man you are while I'm gone. I'll show that you aren't when I get back.
Myal
2007-08-04 00:05:23 UTC
Permalink
Post by Red
Post by Bob Brock
Post by Red
Post by Red
Post by Too_Many_Tools
Post by Red
Bullshit deleted.
What kind of whiny babies are these liberal idiots? They want the
POTUS to have his finger in every pie and his hand patting every back
so that they can blame every negative incident on him. Yet, when POTUS
tries to spy on terrorists and gangsters, they cry that their freedom
is being infringed. Do they want a Nanny state or a free state, or
does it depend on if POTUS is riding an elephant or a jackasss.
Actually his comments are more true than you want to admit.
Any politician visit is carefully orchestrated...especially a
President's...and especially a President's whose popularity is at
RECORD LOWS.....especially during an election cycle for the White
House.
And of course with the BILLIONS being wasted in Iraq instead of being
used to rebuild infrastructure in the United States, President Bush is
very guilty in contributing to this disaster.
Yeah I know it's tough when a President is actually held accountable
for his mistakes.
TMT
Nanny or Free?
Accountable or not?- Hide quoted text -
- Show quoted text -
The ones that should be accountable are the ones that recently
inspected it and passed it. Not Bush or Pawlenty. Gimme a fucking
break already.
It was an Interstate highway. Interstate highways are federal roads. Are
you implying that the federal government is not responsible of letting their
own bridges deteriote to the point of collapse?
Give yourself a fucking break. They decided it was better to spend the
money somewhere else.
Today's Headline: Bridge Falls Down; Impeach Bush!- Hide quoted text -
- Show quoted text -
I forget, was Bush responsible for the Tsunami a few years back?
did the tsunami collapse a fedral interstate in mineapolis ?
Bob Brock
2007-08-04 00:14:57 UTC
Permalink
Post by Myal
Post by Red
Post by Bob Brock
Post by Red
Post by Red
Post by Too_Many_Tools
Post by Red
Bullshit deleted.
What kind of whiny babies are these liberal idiots? They want the
POTUS to have his finger in every pie and his hand patting every back
so that they can blame every negative incident on him. Yet, when POTUS
tries to spy on terrorists and gangsters, they cry that their freedom
is being infringed. Do they want a Nanny state or a free state, or
does it depend on if POTUS is riding an elephant or a jackasss.
Actually his comments are more true than you want to admit.
Any politician visit is carefully orchestrated...especially a
President's...and especially a President's whose popularity is at
RECORD LOWS.....especially during an election cycle for the White
House.
And of course with the BILLIONS being wasted in Iraq instead of being
used to rebuild infrastructure in the United States, President Bush is
very guilty in contributing to this disaster.
Yeah I know it's tough when a President is actually held accountable
for his mistakes.
TMT
Nanny or Free?
Accountable or not?- Hide quoted text -
- Show quoted text -
The ones that should be accountable are the ones that recently
inspected it and passed it. Not Bush or Pawlenty. Gimme a fucking
break already.
It was an Interstate highway. Interstate highways are federal roads.
Are
you implying that the federal government is not responsible of letting their
own bridges deteriote to the point of collapse?
Give yourself a fucking break. They decided it was better to spend the
money somewhere else.
Today's Headline: Bridge Falls Down; Impeach Bush!- Hide quoted text -
- Show quoted text -
I forget, was Bush responsible for the Tsunami a few years back?
did the tsunami collapse a fedral interstate in mineapolis ?
Well, we did have a hurricane wear out some levees in New Orleans ya know.

Let's do what we did then why don't we. We can blame the drivers for being
on the bridge.
Hhhhmmmmm.....
2007-08-04 00:16:15 UTC
Permalink
Post by Red
Post by Bob Brock
Post by Red
Post by Red
Post by Too_Many_Tools
Post by Red
Bullshit deleted.
What kind of whiny babies are these liberal idiots? They want the
POTUS to have his finger in every pie and his hand patting every back
so that they can blame every negative incident on him. Yet, when POTUS
tries to spy on terrorists and gangsters, they cry that their freedom
is being infringed. Do they want a Nanny state or a free state, or
does it depend on if POTUS is riding an elephant or a jackasss.
Actually his comments are more true than you want to admit.
Any politician visit is carefully orchestrated...especially a
President's...and especially a President's whose popularity is at
RECORD LOWS.....especially during an election cycle for the White
House.
And of course with the BILLIONS being wasted in Iraq instead of being
used to rebuild infrastructure in the United States, President Bush is
very guilty in contributing to this disaster.
Yeah I know it's tough when a President is actually held accountable
for his mistakes.
TMT
Nanny or Free?
Accountable or not?- Hide quoted text -
- Show quoted text -
The ones that should be accountable are the ones that recently
inspected it and passed it. Not Bush or Pawlenty. Gimme a fucking
break already.
It was an Interstate highway. Interstate highways are federal roads.
Are
you implying that the federal government is not responsible of letting their
own bridges deteriote to the point of collapse?
Give yourself a fucking break. They decided it was better to spend the
money somewhere else.
Today's Headline: Bridge Falls Down; Impeach Bush!- Hide quoted text -
- Show quoted text -
I forget, was Bush responsible for the Tsunami a few years back?
did the tsunami collapse a fedral interstate in mineapolis ?

-----> pray tell, WHO is responsible for maintaining highways, interstate or
otherwise?




..
h***@hotmail.com
2007-08-04 01:32:50 UTC
Permalink
Post by Myal
Post by Red
Post by Bob Brock
Post by Red
Post by Red
Post by Too_Many_Tools
Post by Red
Bullshit deleted.
What kind of whiny babies are these liberal idiots? They want the
POTUS to have his finger in every pie and his hand patting every back
so that they can blame every negative incident on him. Yet, when POTUS
tries to spy on terrorists and gangsters, they cry that their freedom
is being infringed. Do they want a Nanny state or a free state, or
does it depend on if POTUS is riding an elephant or a jackasss.
Actually his comments are more true than you want to admit.
Any politician visit is carefully orchestrated...especially a
President's...and especially a President's whose popularity is at
RECORD LOWS.....especially during an election cycle for the White
House.
And of course with the BILLIONS being wasted in Iraq instead of being
used to rebuild infrastructure in the United States, President Bush is
very guilty in contributing to this disaster.
Yeah I know it's tough when a President is actually held accountable
for his mistakes.
TMT
Nanny or Free?
Accountable or not?- Hide quoted text -
- Show quoted text -
The ones that should be accountable are the ones that recently
inspected it and passed it. Not Bush or Pawlenty. Gimme a fucking
break already.
It was an Interstate highway. Interstate highways are federal roads.
Are
you implying that the federal government is not responsible of letting their
own bridges deteriote to the point of collapse?
Give yourself a fucking break. They decided it was better to spend the
money somewhere else.
Today's Headline: Bridge Falls Down; Impeach Bush!- Hide quoted text -
- Show quoted text -
I forget, was Bush responsible for the Tsunami a few years back?
did the tsunami collapse a fedral interstate in mineapolis ?
-----> pray tell, WHO is responsible for maintaining highways, interstate or
otherwise?
GW Bush. Have you never seen those federal employees with shovels
full of asphalt?
Bob Brock
2007-08-04 01:40:58 UTC
Permalink
Post by h***@hotmail.com
Post by Myal
Post by Red
Post by Bob Brock
Post by Red
Post by Red
Post by Too_Many_Tools
Post by Red
Bullshit deleted.
What kind of whiny babies are these liberal idiots? They want the
POTUS to have his finger in every pie and his hand patting every back
so that they can blame every negative incident on him. Yet, when POTUS
tries to spy on terrorists and gangsters, they cry that their freedom
is being infringed. Do they want a Nanny state or a free state, or
does it depend on if POTUS is riding an elephant or a jackasss.
Actually his comments are more true than you want to admit.
Any politician visit is carefully orchestrated...especially a
President's...and especially a President's whose popularity is at
RECORD LOWS.....especially during an election cycle for the White
House.
And of course with the BILLIONS being wasted in Iraq instead of being
used to rebuild infrastructure in the United States, President
Bush
is
very guilty in contributing to this disaster.
Yeah I know it's tough when a President is actually held accountable
for his mistakes.
TMT
Nanny or Free?
Accountable or not?- Hide quoted text -
- Show quoted text -
The ones that should be accountable are the ones that recently
inspected it and passed it. Not Bush or Pawlenty. Gimme a fucking
break already.
It was an Interstate highway. Interstate highways are federal roads.
Are
you implying that the federal government is not responsible of letting their
own bridges deteriote to the point of collapse?
Give yourself a fucking break. They decided it was better to spend the
money somewhere else.
Today's Headline: Bridge Falls Down; Impeach Bush!- Hide quoted text -
- Show quoted text -
I forget, was Bush responsible for the Tsunami a few years back?
did the tsunami collapse a fedral interstate in mineapolis ?
-----> pray tell, WHO is responsible for maintaining highways, interstate or
otherwise?
GW Bush. Have you never seen those federal employees with shovels
full of asphalt?
I'm beginning to think that you actually believe that. Frankly, I don't
think that Bush micromanages that much. Besides, he's got bigger crimes to
cover up...er...executive privilege that is.
Hhhhmmmmm.....
2007-08-10 00:24:45 UTC
Permalink
Post by Myal
Post by Red
Post by Bob Brock
Post by Red
Post by Red
Post by Too_Many_Tools
Post by Red
Bullshit deleted.
What kind of whiny babies are these liberal idiots? They want the
POTUS to have his finger in every pie and his hand patting every back
so that they can blame every negative incident on him. Yet, when POTUS
tries to spy on terrorists and gangsters, they cry that their freedom
is being infringed. Do they want a Nanny state or a free state, or
does it depend on if POTUS is riding an elephant or a jackasss.
Actually his comments are more true than you want to admit.
Any politician visit is carefully orchestrated...especially a
President's...and especially a President's whose popularity is at
RECORD LOWS.....especially during an election cycle for the White
House.
And of course with the BILLIONS being wasted in Iraq instead of being
used to rebuild infrastructure in the United States, President Bush is
very guilty in contributing to this disaster.
Yeah I know it's tough when a President is actually held accountable
for his mistakes.
TMT
Nanny or Free?
Accountable or not?- Hide quoted text -
- Show quoted text -
The ones that should be accountable are the ones that recently
inspected it and passed it. Not Bush or Pawlenty. Gimme a fucking
break already.
It was an Interstate highway. Interstate highways are federal roads.
Are
you implying that the federal government is not responsible of letting their
own bridges deteriote to the point of collapse?
Give yourself a fucking break. They decided it was better to spend the
money somewhere else.
Today's Headline: Bridge Falls Down; Impeach Bush!- Hide quoted text -
- Show quoted text -
I forget, was Bush responsible for the Tsunami a few years back?
did the tsunami collapse a fedral interstate in mineapolis ?
-----> pray tell, WHO is responsible for maintaining highways, interstate or
otherwise?
GW Bush. Have you never seen those federal employees with shovels
full of asphalt?

---> I havent seen any government employeestanding by the roadside with a
shovelful of asphalt. ;)


.
Myal
2007-08-04 11:37:22 UTC
Permalink
Post by Myal
Post by Red
Post by Bob Brock
Post by Red
Post by Red
Post by Too_Many_Tools
Post by Red
Bullshit deleted.
What kind of whiny babies are these liberal idiots? They want the
POTUS to have his finger in every pie and his hand patting every back
so that they can blame every negative incident on him. Yet, when POTUS
tries to spy on terrorists and gangsters, they cry that their freedom
is being infringed. Do they want a Nanny state or a free state, or
does it depend on if POTUS is riding an elephant or a jackasss.
Actually his comments are more true than you want to admit.
Any politician visit is carefully orchestrated...especially a
President's...and especially a President's whose popularity is at
RECORD LOWS.....especially during an election cycle for the White
House.
And of course with the BILLIONS being wasted in Iraq instead of being
used to rebuild infrastructure in the United States, President Bush is
very guilty in contributing to this disaster.
Yeah I know it's tough when a President is actually held accountable
for his mistakes.
TMT
Nanny or Free?
Accountable or not?- Hide quoted text -
- Show quoted text -
The ones that should be accountable are the ones that recently
inspected it and passed it. Not Bush or Pawlenty. Gimme a fucking
break already.
It was an Interstate highway. Interstate highways are federal roads.
Are
you implying that the federal government is not responsible of letting their
own bridges deteriote to the point of collapse?
Give yourself a fucking break. They decided it was better to spend the
money somewhere else.
Today's Headline: Bridge Falls Down; Impeach Bush!- Hide quoted text -
- Show quoted text -
I forget, was Bush responsible for the Tsunami a few years back?
did the tsunami collapse a fedral interstate in mineapolis ?
-----> pray tell, WHO is responsible for maintaining highways, interstate or
otherwise?
..
government
h***@hotmail.com
2007-08-04 17:45:20 UTC
Permalink
Post by Bob Brock
Post by Myal
Post by Red
Post by Bob Brock
Post by Red
Post by Red
Post by Too_Many_Tools
Post by Red
Bullshit deleted.
What kind of whiny babies are these liberal idiots? They want the
POTUS to have his finger in every pie and his hand patting every back
so that they can blame every negative incident on him. Yet, when POTUS
tries to spy on terrorists and gangsters, they cry that their freedom
is being infringed. Do they want a Nanny state or a free state, or
does it depend on if POTUS is riding an elephant or a jackasss.
Actually his comments are more true than you want to admit.
Any politician visit is carefully orchestrated...especially a
President's...and especially a President's whose popularity is at
RECORD LOWS.....especially during an election cycle for the White
House.
And of course with the BILLIONS being wasted in Iraq instead of being
used to rebuild infrastructure in the United States, President Bush is
very guilty in contributing to this disaster.
Yeah I know it's tough when a President is actually held accountable
for his mistakes.
TMT
Nanny or Free?
Accountable or not?- Hide quoted text -
- Show quoted text -
The ones that should be accountable are the ones that recently
inspected it and passed it. Not Bush or Pawlenty. Gimme a fucking
break already.
It was an Interstate highway. Interstate highways are federal roads.
Are
you implying that the federal government is not responsible of letting their
own bridges deteriote to the point of collapse?
Give yourself a fucking break. They decided it was better to spend the
money somewhere else.
Today's Headline: Bridge Falls Down; Impeach Bush!- Hide quoted text -
- Show quoted text -
I forget, was Bush responsible for the Tsunami a few years back?
did the tsunami collapse a fedral interstate in mineapolis ?
-----> pray tell, WHO is responsible for maintaining highways, interstate or
otherwise?
..
government
Now, now, now, Myal. Be honest.... "white man's government."
Bob Brock
2007-08-04 17:47:35 UTC
Permalink
Post by h***@hotmail.com
Post by Bob Brock
Post by Myal
Post by Red
Post by Bob Brock
Post by Red
Post by Red
Post by Too_Many_Tools
Post by Red
Bullshit deleted.
What kind of whiny babies are these liberal idiots? They want the
POTUS to have his finger in every pie and his hand patting every back
so that they can blame every negative incident on him. Yet, when POTUS
tries to spy on terrorists and gangsters, they cry that their freedom
is being infringed. Do they want a Nanny state or a free state, or
does it depend on if POTUS is riding an elephant or a jackasss.
Actually his comments are more true than you want to admit.
Any politician visit is carefully orchestrated...especially a
President's...and especially a President's whose popularity is at
RECORD LOWS.....especially during an election cycle for the White
House.
And of course with the BILLIONS being wasted in Iraq instead of being
used to rebuild infrastructure in the United States, President
Bush
is
very guilty in contributing to this disaster.
Yeah I know it's tough when a President is actually held accountable
for his mistakes.
TMT
Nanny or Free?
Accountable or not?- Hide quoted text -
- Show quoted text -
The ones that should be accountable are the ones that recently
inspected it and passed it. Not Bush or Pawlenty. Gimme a fucking
break already.
It was an Interstate highway. Interstate highways are federal roads.
Are
you implying that the federal government is not responsible of
letting
their
own bridges deteriote to the point of collapse?
Give yourself a fucking break. They decided it was better to spend the
money somewhere else.
Today's Headline: Bridge Falls Down; Impeach Bush!- Hide quoted text -
- Show quoted text -
I forget, was Bush responsible for the Tsunami a few years back?
did the tsunami collapse a fedral interstate in mineapolis ?
-----> pray tell, WHO is responsible for maintaining highways, interstate or
otherwise?
..
government
Now, now, now, Myal. Be honest.... "white man's government."
God almighty, you'er stupid.
h***@hotmail.com
2007-08-05 02:06:43 UTC
Permalink
Post by Bob Brock
Post by h***@hotmail.com
Post by Bob Brock
Post by Myal
Post by Red
Post by Bob Brock
Post by Red
Post by Red
Post by Too_Many_Tools
Post by Red
Bullshit deleted.
What kind of whiny babies are these liberal idiots? They want the
POTUS to have his finger in every pie and his hand patting every
back
so that they can blame every negative incident on him. Yet, when
POTUS
tries to spy on terrorists and gangsters, they cry that their
freedom
is being infringed. Do they want a Nanny state or a free state, or
does it depend on if POTUS is riding an elephant or a jackasss.
Actually his comments are more true than you want to admit.
Any politician visit is carefully orchestrated...especially a
President's...and especially a President's whose popularity is at
RECORD LOWS.....especially during an election cycle for the White
House.
And of course with the BILLIONS being wasted in Iraq instead of being
used to rebuild infrastructure in the United States, President
Bush
is
very guilty in contributing to this disaster.
Yeah I know it's tough when a President is actually held accountable
for his mistakes.
TMT
Nanny or Free?
Accountable or not?- Hide quoted text -
- Show quoted text -
The ones that should be accountable are the ones that recently
inspected it and passed it. Not Bush or Pawlenty. Gimme a fucking
break already.
It was an Interstate highway. Interstate highways are federal roads.
Are
you implying that the federal government is not responsible of
letting
their
own bridges deteriote to the point of collapse?
Give yourself a fucking break. They decided it was better to spend the
money somewhere else.
Today's Headline: Bridge Falls Down; Impeach Bush!- Hide quoted text -
- Show quoted text -
I forget, was Bush responsible for the Tsunami a few years back?
did the tsunami collapse a fedral interstate in mineapolis ?
-----> pray tell, WHO is responsible for maintaining highways, interstate or
otherwise?
..
government
Now, now, now, Myal. Be honest.... "white man's government."
God almighty, you'er stupid.
I sure hope you're an atheist. God can read through your typos.
Bob Brock
2007-08-05 02:30:43 UTC
Permalink
Post by h***@hotmail.com
Post by Bob Brock
Post by h***@hotmail.com
Post by Bob Brock
Post by Myal
Post by Red
Post by Bob Brock
Post by Red
Post by Red
Post by Too_Many_Tools
Post by Red
Bullshit deleted.
What kind of whiny babies are these liberal idiots? They want the
POTUS to have his finger in every pie and his hand patting every
back
so that they can blame every negative incident on him. Yet, when
POTUS
tries to spy on terrorists and gangsters, they cry that their
freedom
is being infringed. Do they want a Nanny state or a free
state,
or
does it depend on if POTUS is riding an elephant or a jackasss.
Actually his comments are more true than you want to admit.
Any politician visit is carefully orchestrated...especially a
President's...and especially a President's whose popularity is at
RECORD LOWS.....especially during an election cycle for the White
House.
And of course with the BILLIONS being wasted in Iraq instead
of
being
used to rebuild infrastructure in the United States, President
Bush
is
very guilty in contributing to this disaster.
Yeah I know it's tough when a President is actually held
accountable
for his mistakes.
TMT
Nanny or Free?
Accountable or not?- Hide quoted text -
- Show quoted text -
The ones that should be accountable are the ones that recently
inspected it and passed it. Not Bush or Pawlenty. Gimme a fucking
break already.
It was an Interstate highway. Interstate highways are federal roads.
Are
you implying that the federal government is not responsible of
letting
their
own bridges deteriote to the point of collapse?
Give yourself a fucking break. They decided it was better to
spend
the
money somewhere else.
Today's Headline: Bridge Falls Down; Impeach Bush!- Hide quoted text -
- Show quoted text -
I forget, was Bush responsible for the Tsunami a few years back?
did the tsunami collapse a fedral interstate in mineapolis ?
-----> pray tell, WHO is responsible for maintaining highways, interstate or
otherwise?
..
government
Now, now, now, Myal. Be honest.... "white man's government."
God almighty, you'er stupid.
I sure hope you're an atheist. God can read through your typos.
Who said it was a typo? You're truly stupid.
Hhhhmmmmm.....
2007-08-10 00:23:45 UTC
Permalink
Post by Myal
Post by Red
Post by Bob Brock
Post by Red
Post by Red
Post by Too_Many_Tools
Post by Red
Bullshit deleted.
What kind of whiny babies are these liberal idiots? They want the
POTUS to have his finger in every pie and his hand patting every back
so that they can blame every negative incident on him. Yet, when POTUS
tries to spy on terrorists and gangsters, they cry that their freedom
is being infringed. Do they want a Nanny state or a free state, or
does it depend on if POTUS is riding an elephant or a jackasss.
Actually his comments are more true than you want to admit.
Any politician visit is carefully orchestrated...especially a
President's...and especially a President's whose popularity is at
RECORD LOWS.....especially during an election cycle for the White
House.
And of course with the BILLIONS being wasted in Iraq instead of being
used to rebuild infrastructure in the United States, President Bush is
very guilty in contributing to this disaster.
Yeah I know it's tough when a President is actually held accountable
for his mistakes.
TMT
Nanny or Free?
Accountable or not?- Hide quoted text -
- Show quoted text -
The ones that should be accountable are the ones that recently
inspected it and passed it. Not Bush or Pawlenty. Gimme a fucking
break already.
It was an Interstate highway. Interstate highways are federal roads.
Are
you implying that the federal government is not responsible of letting their
own bridges deteriote to the point of collapse?
Give yourself a fucking break. They decided it was better to spend the
money somewhere else.
Today's Headline: Bridge Falls Down; Impeach Bush!- Hide quoted text -
- Show quoted text -
I forget, was Bush responsible for the Tsunami a few years back?
did the tsunami collapse a fedral interstate in mineapolis ?
-----> pray tell, WHO is responsible for maintaining highways, interstate or
otherwise?
..
government


----> STATE government, you idiot. take a fucking civics class





.
Myal
2007-08-10 03:50:04 UTC
Permalink
Post by Bob Brock
Post by Myal
Post by Red
Post by Bob Brock
Post by Red
Post by Red
Post by Too_Many_Tools
Post by Red
Bullshit deleted.
What kind of whiny babies are these liberal idiots? They want the
POTUS to have his finger in every pie and his hand patting every back
so that they can blame every negative incident on him. Yet, when POTUS
tries to spy on terrorists and gangsters, they cry that their freedom
is being infringed. Do they want a Nanny state or a free state, or
does it depend on if POTUS is riding an elephant or a jackasss.
Actually his comments are more true than you want to admit.
Any politician visit is carefully orchestrated...especially a
President's...and especially a President's whose popularity is at
RECORD LOWS.....especially during an election cycle for the White
House.
And of course with the BILLIONS being wasted in Iraq instead of being
used to rebuild infrastructure in the United States, President Bush is
very guilty in contributing to this disaster.
Yeah I know it's tough when a President is actually held accountable
for his mistakes.
TMT
Nanny or Free?
Accountable or not?- Hide quoted text -
- Show quoted text -
The ones that should be accountable are the ones that recently
inspected it and passed it. Not Bush or Pawlenty. Gimme a fucking
break already.
It was an Interstate highway. Interstate highways are federal roads.
Are
you implying that the federal government is not responsible of letting their
own bridges deteriote to the point of collapse?
Give yourself a fucking break. They decided it was better to spend the
money somewhere else.
Today's Headline: Bridge Falls Down; Impeach Bush!- Hide quoted text -
- Show quoted text -
I forget, was Bush responsible for the Tsunami a few years back?
did the tsunami collapse a fedral interstate in mineapolis ?
-----> pray tell, WHO is responsible for maintaining highways, interstate or
otherwise?
..
government
----> STATE government, you idiot. take a fucking civics class
government is government ,

to argue more than that is simply determining depth and shade ...
Post by Bob Brock
.
Hhhhmmmmm.....
2007-08-10 16:18:24 UTC
Permalink
Post by Bob Brock
Post by Myal
Post by Red
Post by Bob Brock
Post by Red
Post by Red
Post by Too_Many_Tools
Post by Red
Bullshit deleted.
What kind of whiny babies are these liberal idiots? They want the
POTUS to have his finger in every pie and his hand patting every back
so that they can blame every negative incident on him. Yet, when POTUS
tries to spy on terrorists and gangsters, they cry that their freedom
is being infringed. Do they want a Nanny state or a free state, or
does it depend on if POTUS is riding an elephant or a jackasss.
Actually his comments are more true than you want to admit.
Any politician visit is carefully orchestrated...especially a
President's...and especially a President's whose popularity is at
RECORD LOWS.....especially during an election cycle for the White
House.
And of course with the BILLIONS being wasted in Iraq instead of being
used to rebuild infrastructure in the United States, President Bush is
very guilty in contributing to this disaster.
Yeah I know it's tough when a President is actually held accountable
for his mistakes.
TMT
Nanny or Free?
Accountable or not?- Hide quoted text -
- Show quoted text -
The ones that should be accountable are the ones that recently
inspected it and passed it. Not Bush or Pawlenty. Gimme a fucking
break already.
It was an Interstate highway. Interstate highways are federal roads.
Are
you implying that the federal government is not responsible of letting their
own bridges deteriote to the point of collapse?
Give yourself a fucking break. They decided it was better to spend the
money somewhere else.
Today's Headline: Bridge Falls Down; Impeach Bush!- Hide quoted text -
- Show quoted text -
I forget, was Bush responsible for the Tsunami a few years back?
did the tsunami collapse a fedral interstate in mineapolis ?
-----> pray tell, WHO is responsible for maintaining highways, interstate or
otherwise?
..
government
----> STATE government, you idiot. take a fucking civics class
government is government ,

to argue more than that is simply determining depth and shade ...



-------> in other words, you have no klew as to what federalism is and how
the constitution separates powers. sheesh. another product of 40 years of
liberal education.
Post by Bob Brock
.
Stuart Grey
2007-08-10 16:21:54 UTC
Permalink
Post by Myal
government is government ,
to argue more than that is simply determining depth and shade ...
The shades, of course, are very important, yet far too many ignorant
nitwits can't tell the difference and don't know why it's important.

Are you one of those?
Myal
2007-08-10 23:05:46 UTC
Permalink
Post by Myal
Post by Bob Brock
Post by Myal
Post by Red
Post by Bob Brock
Post by Red
Post by Red
Post by Too_Many_Tools
Post by Red
Bullshit deleted.
What kind of whiny babies are these liberal idiots? They want the
POTUS to have his finger in every pie and his hand patting every back
so that they can blame every negative incident on him. Yet, when POTUS
tries to spy on terrorists and gangsters, they cry that their freedom
is being infringed. Do they want a Nanny state or a free state, or
does it depend on if POTUS is riding an elephant or a jackasss.
Actually his comments are more true than you want to admit.
Any politician visit is carefully orchestrated...especially a
President's...and especially a President's whose popularity is at
RECORD LOWS.....especially during an election cycle for the White
House.
And of course with the BILLIONS being wasted in Iraq instead of being
used to rebuild infrastructure in the United States, President Bush is
very guilty in contributing to this disaster.
Yeah I know it's tough when a President is actually held accountable
for his mistakes.
TMT
Nanny or Free?
Accountable or not?- Hide quoted text -
- Show quoted text -
The ones that should be accountable are the ones that recently
inspected it and passed it. Not Bush or Pawlenty. Gimme a fucking
break already.
It was an Interstate highway. Interstate highways are federal roads.
Are
you implying that the federal government is not responsible of letting their
own bridges deteriote to the point of collapse?
Give yourself a fucking break. They decided it was better to spend the
money somewhere else.
Today's Headline: Bridge Falls Down; Impeach Bush!- Hide quoted text -
- Show quoted text -
I forget, was Bush responsible for the Tsunami a few years back?
did the tsunami collapse a fedral interstate in mineapolis ?
-----> pray tell, WHO is responsible for maintaining highways, interstate or
otherwise?
..
government
----> STATE government, you idiot. take a fucking civics class
government is government ,
to argue more than that is simply determining depth and shade ...
-------> in other words, you have no klew as to what federalism is and how
the constitution separates powers. sheesh. another product of 40 years of
liberal education.
your beloved liberal education has obviously given you great insightinto
the depth , shade and flavor of shit ...

be proud
Post by Myal
Post by Bob Brock
.
Hhhhmmmmm.....
2007-08-16 15:38:35 UTC
Permalink
Post by Myal
Post by Bob Brock
Post by Myal
Post by Red
Post by Bob Brock
Post by Red
Post by Red
Post by Too_Many_Tools
Post by Red
Bullshit deleted.
What kind of whiny babies are these liberal idiots? They want the
POTUS to have his finger in every pie and his hand patting every back
so that they can blame every negative incident on him. Yet, when POTUS
tries to spy on terrorists and gangsters, they cry that their freedom
is being infringed. Do they want a Nanny state or a free state, or
does it depend on if POTUS is riding an elephant or a jackasss.
Actually his comments are more true than you want to admit.
Any politician visit is carefully orchestrated...especially a
President's...and especially a President's whose popularity is at
RECORD LOWS.....especially during an election cycle for the White
House.
And of course with the BILLIONS being wasted in Iraq instead of being
used to rebuild infrastructure in the United States, President
Bush
is
very guilty in contributing to this disaster.
Yeah I know it's tough when a President is actually held accountable
for his mistakes.
TMT
Nanny or Free?
Accountable or not?- Hide quoted text -
- Show quoted text -
The ones that should be accountable are the ones that recently
inspected it and passed it. Not Bush or Pawlenty. Gimme a fucking
break already.
It was an Interstate highway. Interstate highways are federal roads.
Are
you implying that the federal government is not responsible of letting their
own bridges deteriote to the point of collapse?
Give yourself a fucking break. They decided it was better to spend the
money somewhere else.
Today's Headline: Bridge Falls Down; Impeach Bush!- Hide quoted text -
- Show quoted text -
I forget, was Bush responsible for the Tsunami a few years back?
did the tsunami collapse a fedral interstate in mineapolis ?
-----> pray tell, WHO is responsible for maintaining highways, interstate or
otherwise?
..
government
----> STATE government, you idiot. take a fucking civics class
government is government ,
to argue more than that is simply determining depth and shade ...
-------> in other words, you have no klew as to what federalism is and how
the constitution separates powers. sheesh. another product of 40 years of
liberal education.
your beloved liberal education has obviously given you great insightinto
the depth , shade and flavor of shit ...

be proud


---> hey, fuckhead - the recent news as published in numerous papers
throughout the country, not to mention TV and radio stories - supports my
view - it is STATE and LOCAL government that is responsible for inspecting
and maintaining roads in this nation.

-----> YOU are an idiot who can only parrot what your demolib masters tell
you.

---> grow up, get an education, and be an adult. oh look who I am talking
to - another brain dead liberal leftist idiot.
Post by Myal
Post by Bob Brock
.
Myal
2007-08-16 23:03:49 UTC
Permalink
Post by Myal
Post by Myal
Post by Bob Brock
Post by Myal
Post by Red
Post by Bob Brock
Post by Red
Post by Red
Post by Too_Many_Tools
Post by Red
Bullshit deleted.
What kind of whiny babies are these liberal idiots? They want the
POTUS to have his finger in every pie and his hand patting every back
so that they can blame every negative incident on him. Yet, when POTUS
tries to spy on terrorists and gangsters, they cry that their freedom
is being infringed. Do they want a Nanny state or a free state, or
does it depend on if POTUS is riding an elephant or a jackasss.
Actually his comments are more true than you want to admit.
Any politician visit is carefully orchestrated...especially a
President's...and especially a President's whose popularity is at
RECORD LOWS.....especially during an election cycle for the White
House.
And of course with the BILLIONS being wasted in Iraq instead of being
used to rebuild infrastructure in the United States, President
Bush
is
very guilty in contributing to this disaster.
Yeah I know it's tough when a President is actually held accountable
for his mistakes.
TMT
Nanny or Free?
Accountable or not?- Hide quoted text -
- Show quoted text -
The ones that should be accountable are the ones that recently
inspected it and passed it. Not Bush or Pawlenty. Gimme a fucking
break already.
It was an Interstate highway. Interstate highways are federal roads.
Are
you implying that the federal government is not responsible of letting their
own bridges deteriote to the point of collapse?
Give yourself a fucking break. They decided it was better to spend the
money somewhere else.
Today's Headline: Bridge Falls Down; Impeach Bush!- Hide quoted text -
- Show quoted text -
I forget, was Bush responsible for the Tsunami a few years back?
did the tsunami collapse a fedral interstate in mineapolis ?
-----> pray tell, WHO is responsible for maintaining highways, interstate or
otherwise?
..
government
----> STATE government, you idiot. take a fucking civics class
government is government ,
to argue more than that is simply determining depth and shade ...
-------> in other words, you have no klew as to what federalism is and how
the constitution separates powers. sheesh. another product of 40 years of
liberal education.
your beloved liberal education has obviously given you great insightinto
the depth , shade and flavor of shit ...
be proud
---> hey, fuckhead - the recent news as published in numerous papers
throughout the country, not to mention TV and radio stories - supports my
view - it is STATE and LOCAL government that is responsible for inspecting
and maintaining roads in this nation.
-----> YOU are an idiot who can only parrot what your demolib masters tell
you.
---> grow up, get an education, and be an adult. oh look who I am talking
to - another brain dead liberal leftist idiot.
thank you for making my point , it is government responsibility , not
private .

you are free to keep ranting about shades of shit , in fact free to play
in it as much as you want , it is amusing to see you wallowing in the
stuff trying to show the difference between one lump of shit and another .

please , dont stop :)
Post by Myal
Post by Myal
Post by Bob Brock
.
Hhhhmmmmm.....
2007-08-19 11:51:16 UTC
Permalink
Post by Myal
Post by Myal
Post by Bob Brock
Post by Myal
Post by Red
Post by Bob Brock
Post by Red
Post by Red
Post by Too_Many_Tools
Post by Red
Bullshit deleted.
What kind of whiny babies are these liberal idiots? They want the
POTUS to have his finger in every pie and his hand patting every back
so that they can blame every negative incident on him. Yet, when POTUS
tries to spy on terrorists and gangsters, they cry that their freedom
is being infringed. Do they want a Nanny state or a free state, or
does it depend on if POTUS is riding an elephant or a jackasss.
Actually his comments are more true than you want to admit.
Any politician visit is carefully orchestrated...especially a
President's...and especially a President's whose popularity is at
RECORD LOWS.....especially during an election cycle for the White
House.
And of course with the BILLIONS being wasted in Iraq instead of being
used to rebuild infrastructure in the United States, President
Bush
is
very guilty in contributing to this disaster.
Yeah I know it's tough when a President is actually held accountable
for his mistakes.
TMT
Nanny or Free?
Accountable or not?- Hide quoted text -
- Show quoted text -
The ones that should be accountable are the ones that recently
inspected it and passed it. Not Bush or Pawlenty. Gimme a fucking
break already.
It was an Interstate highway. Interstate highways are federal roads.
Are
you implying that the federal government is not responsible of
letting
their
own bridges deteriote to the point of collapse?
Give yourself a fucking break. They decided it was better to spend the
money somewhere else.
Today's Headline: Bridge Falls Down; Impeach Bush!- Hide quoted text -
- Show quoted text -
I forget, was Bush responsible for the Tsunami a few years back?
did the tsunami collapse a fedral interstate in mineapolis ?
-----> pray tell, WHO is responsible for maintaining highways,
interstate
or
otherwise?
..
government
----> STATE government, you idiot. take a fucking civics class
government is government ,
to argue more than that is simply determining depth and shade ...
-------> in other words, you have no klew as to what federalism is and how
the constitution separates powers. sheesh. another product of 40 years of
liberal education.
your beloved liberal education has obviously given you great insightinto
the depth , shade and flavor of shit ...
be proud
---> hey, fuckhead - the recent news as published in numerous papers
throughout the country, not to mention TV and radio stories - supports my
view - it is STATE and LOCAL government that is responsible for inspecting
and maintaining roads in this nation.
-----> YOU are an idiot who can only parrot what your demolib masters tell
you.
---> grow up, get an education, and be an adult. oh look who I am talking
to - another brain dead liberal leftist idiot.
thank you for making my point , it is government responsibility , not
private .


------> who does goernment hire to do the job? particularly the large highly
captial intense jobs of major roads and bridges?


you are free to keep ranting about shades of shit , in fact free to play
in it as much as you want , it is amusing to see you wallowing in the
stuff trying to show the difference between one lump of shit and another .

---> you are free to continue to remain an ingnoramous, a prisoner of you
demolib brainwashing

please , dont stop :)

---> so long as one idiot leftist ignoramous whack job remains, my rants
continue. get an education. free yourself of the prison in which you reside
Post by Myal
Post by Myal
Post by Bob Brock
.
Myal
2007-08-19 16:40:14 UTC
Permalink
Post by Myal
Post by Myal
Post by Myal
Post by Bob Brock
Post by Myal
Post by Red
Post by Bob Brock
Post by Red
Post by Red
Post by Too_Many_Tools
Post by Red
Bullshit deleted.
What kind of whiny babies are these liberal idiots? They want the
POTUS to have his finger in every pie and his hand patting every back
so that they can blame every negative incident on him. Yet, when
POTUS
tries to spy on terrorists and gangsters, they cry that their freedom
is being infringed. Do they want a Nanny state or a free state, or
does it depend on if POTUS is riding an elephant or a jackasss.
Actually his comments are more true than you want to admit.
Any politician visit is carefully orchestrated...especially a
President's...and especially a President's whose popularity is at
RECORD LOWS.....especially during an election cycle for the White
House.
And of course with the BILLIONS being wasted in Iraq instead of being
used to rebuild infrastructure in the United States, President
Bush
is
very guilty in contributing to this disaster.
Yeah I know it's tough when a President is actually held accountable
for his mistakes.
TMT
Nanny or Free?
Accountable or not?- Hide quoted text -
- Show quoted text -
The ones that should be accountable are the ones that recently
inspected it and passed it. Not Bush or Pawlenty. Gimme a fucking
break already.
It was an Interstate highway. Interstate highways are federal roads.
Are
you implying that the federal government is not responsible of
letting
their
own bridges deteriote to the point of collapse?
Give yourself a fucking break. They decided it was better to spend the
money somewhere else.
Today's Headline: Bridge Falls Down; Impeach Bush!- Hide quoted text -
- Show quoted text -
I forget, was Bush responsible for the Tsunami a few years back?
did the tsunami collapse a fedral interstate in mineapolis ?
-----> pray tell, WHO is responsible for maintaining highways,
interstate
or
otherwise?
..
government
----> STATE government, you idiot. take a fucking civics class
government is government ,
to argue more than that is simply determining depth and shade ...
-------> in other words, you have no klew as to what federalism is and how
the constitution separates powers. sheesh. another product of 40 years of
liberal education.
your beloved liberal education has obviously given you great insightinto
the depth , shade and flavor of shit ...
be proud
---> hey, fuckhead - the recent news as published in numerous papers
throughout the country, not to mention TV and radio stories - supports my
view - it is STATE and LOCAL government that is responsible for inspecting
and maintaining roads in this nation.
-----> YOU are an idiot who can only parrot what your demolib masters tell
you.
---> grow up, get an education, and be an adult. oh look who I am talking
to - another brain dead liberal leftist idiot.
thank you for making my point , it is government responsibility , not
private .
------> who does goernment hire to do the job? particularly the large highly
captial intense jobs of major roads and bridges?
you are free to keep ranting about shades of shit , in fact free to play
in it as much as you want , it is amusing to see you wallowing in the
stuff trying to show the difference between one lump of shit and another .
---> you are free to continue to remain an ingnoramous, a prisoner of you
demolib brainwashing
please , dont stop :)
---> so long as one idiot leftist ignoramous whack job remains, my rants
continue. get an education. free yourself of the prison in which you reside
if I was in america or american , doubtless I would be a full fledged
member of the cult of politics , but I aint so its not required , it is
govt responsibility , not mine , for me that means end of story , some
dirty stinking theiving lying bastard of a politician carries the can
for that one

OTOH , I understand that the US govt keeps peopl happy by giving them
different divisions of govt to worship and fight over , as you are
attempting to do here

this is cute , nice even , and obviously does stop folk thinking about
getting their tax$$s worth from their govt as well

your politicians are smart , you folk are also dumb
Post by Myal
Post by Myal
Post by Myal
Post by Bob Brock
.
h***@hotmail.com
2007-08-04 01:30:10 UTC
Permalink
Post by Red
Post by h***@hotmail.com
Post by Bob Brock
Post by Red
Post by Red
Post by Too_Many_Tools
Post by Red
Bullshit deleted.
What kind of whiny babies are these liberal idiots? They want the
POTUS to have his finger in every pie and his hand patting every
back
so that they can blame every negative incident on him. Yet, when
POTUS
tries to spy on terrorists and gangsters, they cry that their
freedom
is being infringed. Do they want a Nanny state or a free state, or
does it depend on if POTUS is riding an elephant or a jackasss.
Actually his comments are more true than you want to admit.
Any politician visit is carefully orchestrated...especially a
President's...and especially a President's whose popularity is at
RECORD LOWS.....especially during an election cycle for the White
House.
And of course with the BILLIONS being wasted in Iraq instead of being
used to rebuild infrastructure in the United States, President Bush is
very guilty in contributing to this disaster.
Yeah I know it's tough when a President is actually held accountable
for his mistakes.
TMT
Nanny or Free?
Accountable or not?- Hide quoted text -
- Show quoted text -
The ones that should be accountable are the ones that recently
inspected it and passed it. Not Bush or Pawlenty. Gimme a fucking
break already.
It was an Interstate highway. Interstate highways are federal roads. Are
you implying that the federal government is not responsible of letting their
own bridges deteriote to the point of collapse?
Give yourself a fucking break. They decided it was better to spend the
money somewhere else.
Today's Headline: Bridge Falls Down; Impeach Bush!
I forget, was Bush responsible for the Tsunami a few years back?
Yep, and Katrina.

The insurance companies have made pen and ink changes to all of their
documents. They lined through "Acts of God" and wrote in "Bush."
Bob Brock
2007-08-04 01:39:00 UTC
Permalink
Post by h***@hotmail.com
Post by Red
Post by h***@hotmail.com
Post by Bob Brock
Post by Red
Post by Red
Post by Too_Many_Tools
Post by Red
Bullshit deleted.
What kind of whiny babies are these liberal idiots? They want the
POTUS to have his finger in every pie and his hand patting every
back
so that they can blame every negative incident on him. Yet, when
POTUS
tries to spy on terrorists and gangsters, they cry that their
freedom
is being infringed. Do they want a Nanny state or a free
state, or
does it depend on if POTUS is riding an elephant or a jackasss.
Actually his comments are more true than you want to admit.
Any politician visit is carefully orchestrated...especially a
President's...and especially a President's whose popularity is at
RECORD LOWS.....especially during an election cycle for the White
House.
And of course with the BILLIONS being wasted in Iraq instead of being
used to rebuild infrastructure in the United States, President
Bush is
very guilty in contributing to this disaster.
Yeah I know it's tough when a President is actually held accountable
for his mistakes.
TMT
Nanny or Free?
Accountable or not?- Hide quoted text -
- Show quoted text -
The ones that should be accountable are the ones that recently
inspected it and passed it. Not Bush or Pawlenty. Gimme a fucking
break already.
It was an Interstate highway. Interstate highways are federal roads.
Are
you implying that the federal government is not responsible of letting their
own bridges deteriote to the point of collapse?
Give yourself a fucking break. They decided it was better to spend the
money somewhere else.
Today's Headline: Bridge Falls Down; Impeach Bush!
I forget, was Bush responsible for the Tsunami a few years back?
Yep, and Katrina.
The insurance companies have made pen and ink changes to all of their
documents. They lined through "Acts of God" and wrote in "Bush."
Well, you have moved him up to the rank of a God, so I guess that makes
sense to you.
h***@hotmail.com
2007-08-04 17:46:27 UTC
Permalink
Post by Bob Brock
Post by h***@hotmail.com
Post by Red
Post by h***@hotmail.com
Post by Bob Brock
Post by Red
Post by Red
Post by Too_Many_Tools
Post by Red
Bullshit deleted.
What kind of whiny babies are these liberal idiots? They want
the
POTUS to have his finger in every pie and his hand patting
every
back
so that they can blame every negative incident on him. Yet,
when
POTUS
tries to spy on terrorists and gangsters, they cry that their
freedom
is being infringed. Do they want a Nanny state or a free
state, or
does it depend on if POTUS is riding an elephant or a
jackasss.
Actually his comments are more true than you want to admit.
Any politician visit is carefully orchestrated...especially a
President's...and especially a President's whose popularity is at
RECORD LOWS.....especially during an election cycle for the White
House.
And of course with the BILLIONS being wasted in Iraq instead of
being
used to rebuild infrastructure in the United States, President
Bush is
very guilty in contributing to this disaster.
Yeah I know it's tough when a President is actually held
accountable
for his mistakes.
TMT
Nanny or Free?
Accountable or not?- Hide quoted text -
- Show quoted text -
The ones that should be accountable are the ones that recently
inspected it and passed it. Not Bush or Pawlenty. Gimme a fucking
break already.
It was an Interstate highway. Interstate highways are federal roads.
Are
you implying that the federal government is not responsible of letting their
own bridges deteriote to the point of collapse?
Give yourself a fucking break. They decided it was better to spend the
money somewhere else.
Today's Headline: Bridge Falls Down; Impeach Bush!
I forget, was Bush responsible for the Tsunami a few years back?
Yep, and Katrina.
The insurance companies have made pen and ink changes to all of their
documents. They lined through "Acts of God" and wrote in "Bush."
Well, you have moved him up to the rank of a God, so I guess that makes
sense to you.
Me??? I'm merely commenting on the phenomenon of leftist thought.
Bob Brock
2007-08-04 19:10:43 UTC
Permalink
Post by h***@hotmail.com
Post by Bob Brock
Post by h***@hotmail.com
Post by Red
Post by h***@hotmail.com
Post by Bob Brock
Post by Red
Post by Red
Post by Too_Many_Tools
Post by Red
Bullshit deleted.
What kind of whiny babies are these liberal idiots? They
want
the
POTUS to have his finger in every pie and his hand patting
every
back
so that they can blame every negative incident on him. Yet,
when
POTUS
tries to spy on terrorists and gangsters, they cry that
their
freedom
is being infringed. Do they want a Nanny state or a free
state, or
does it depend on if POTUS is riding an elephant or a
jackasss.
Actually his comments are more true than you want to admit.
Any politician visit is carefully orchestrated...especially a
President's...and especially a President's whose popularity
is
at
RECORD LOWS.....especially during an election cycle for the
White
House.
And of course with the BILLIONS being wasted in Iraq instead of
being
used to rebuild infrastructure in the United States, President
Bush is
very guilty in contributing to this disaster.
Yeah I know it's tough when a President is actually held
accountable
for his mistakes.
TMT
Nanny or Free?
Accountable or not?- Hide quoted text -
- Show quoted text -
The ones that should be accountable are the ones that recently
inspected it and passed it. Not Bush or Pawlenty. Gimme a fucking
break already.
It was an Interstate highway. Interstate highways are federal roads.
Are
you implying that the federal government is not responsible of
letting their
own bridges deteriote to the point of collapse?
Give yourself a fucking break. They decided it was better to
spend
the
money somewhere else.
Today's Headline: Bridge Falls Down; Impeach Bush!
I forget, was Bush responsible for the Tsunami a few years back?
Yep, and Katrina.
The insurance companies have made pen and ink changes to all of their
documents. They lined through "Acts of God" and wrote in "Bush."
Well, you have moved him up to the rank of a God, so I guess that makes
sense to you.
Me??? I'm merely commenting on the phenomenon of leftist thought.
Well, at least they are capable of thought.
Too_Many_Tools
2007-08-04 02:15:31 UTC
Permalink
Post by Bob Brock
Post by Red
Post by Red
Post by Too_Many_Tools
Post by Red
Bullshit deleted.
What kind of whiny babies are these liberal idiots? They want the
POTUS to have his finger in every pie and his hand patting every
back
so that they can blame every negative incident on him. Yet, when
POTUS
tries to spy on terrorists and gangsters, they cry that their
freedom
is being infringed. Do they want a Nanny state or a free state, or
does it depend on if POTUS is riding an elephant or a jackasss.
Actually his comments are more true than you want to admit.
Any politician visit is carefully orchestrated...especially a
President's...and especially a President's whose popularity is at
RECORD LOWS.....especially during an election cycle for the White
House.
And of course with the BILLIONS being wasted in Iraq instead of being
used to rebuild infrastructure in the United States, President Bush is
very guilty in contributing to this disaster.
Yeah I know it's tough when a President is actually held accountable
for his mistakes.
TMT
Nanny or Free?
Accountable or not?- Hide quoted text -
- Show quoted text -
The ones that should be accountable are the ones that recently
inspected it and passed it. Not Bush or Pawlenty. Gimme a fucking
break already.
It was an Interstate highway. Interstate highways are federal roads. Are
you implying that the federal government is not responsible of letting their
own bridges deteriote to the point of collapse?
Give yourself a fucking break. They decided it was better to spend the
money somewhere else.
Today's Headline: Bridge Falls Down; Impeach Bush!- Hide quoted text -
- Show quoted text -
I forget, was Bush responsible for the Tsunami a few years back?- Hide quoted text -
- Show quoted text -
I forget, was Bush responsible for the Tsunami a few years back?- Hide quoted text -
No but he was responsible for the numbers of dead....he cut funding to
the sensor system that was supposed to be in place that would have
warned the living that the tsunami was coming....

Yeah the SOB gets around....

TMT
h***@hotmail.com
2007-08-05 02:06:27 UTC
Permalink
Post by Too_Many_Tools
Post by Bob Brock
Post by Red
Post by Red
Post by Too_Many_Tools
Post by Red
Bullshit deleted.
What kind of whiny babies are these liberal idiots? They want the
POTUS to have his finger in every pie and his hand patting every
back
so that they can blame every negative incident on him. Yet, when
POTUS
tries to spy on terrorists and gangsters, they cry that their
freedom
is being infringed. Do they want a Nanny state or a free state, or
does it depend on if POTUS is riding an elephant or a jackasss.
Actually his comments are more true than you want to admit.
Any politician visit is carefully orchestrated...especially a
President's...and especially a President's whose popularity is at
RECORD LOWS.....especially during an election cycle for the White
House.
And of course with the BILLIONS being wasted in Iraq instead of being
used to rebuild infrastructure in the United States, President Bush is
very guilty in contributing to this disaster.
Yeah I know it's tough when a President is actually held accountable
for his mistakes.
TMT
Nanny or Free?
Accountable or not?- Hide quoted text -
- Show quoted text -
The ones that should be accountable are the ones that recently
inspected it and passed it. Not Bush or Pawlenty. Gimme a fucking
break already.
It was an Interstate highway. Interstate highways are federal roads. Are
you implying that the federal government is not responsible of letting their
own bridges deteriote to the point of collapse?
Give yourself a fucking break. They decided it was better to spend the
money somewhere else.
Today's Headline: Bridge Falls Down; Impeach Bush!- Hide quoted text -
- Show quoted text -
I forget, was Bush responsible for the Tsunami a few years back?- Hide quoted text -
- Show quoted text -
I forget, was Bush responsible for the Tsunami a few years back?- Hide quoted text -
No but he was responsible for the numbers of dead....he cut funding to
the sensor system that was supposed to be in place that would have
warned the living that the tsunami was coming....
Yeah the SOB gets around....
TMT
There it is again, everyone hates America, but expects it to warn them
of danger and save them from it.
Hhhhmmmmm.....
2007-08-03 23:33:01 UTC
Permalink
Post by Red
Post by Red
Post by Too_Many_Tools
Post by Red
Bullshit deleted.
What kind of whiny babies are these liberal idiots? They want the
POTUS to have his finger in every pie and his hand patting every back
so that they can blame every negative incident on him. Yet, when POTUS
tries to spy on terrorists and gangsters, they cry that their freedom
is being infringed. Do they want a Nanny state or a free state, or
does it depend on if POTUS is riding an elephant or a jackasss.
Actually his comments are more true than you want to admit.
Any politician visit is carefully orchestrated...especially a
President's...and especially a President's whose popularity is at
RECORD LOWS.....especially during an election cycle for the White
House.
And of course with the BILLIONS being wasted in Iraq instead of being
used to rebuild infrastructure in the United States, President Bush is
very guilty in contributing to this disaster.
Yeah I know it's tough when a President is actually held accountable
for his mistakes.
TMT
Nanny or Free?
Accountable or not?- Hide quoted text -
- Show quoted text -
The ones that should be accountable are the ones that recently
inspected it and passed it. Not Bush or Pawlenty. Gimme a fucking
break already.
It was an Interstate highway. Interstate highways are federal roads. Are
you implying that the federal government is not responsible of letting their
own bridges deteriote to the point of collapse?

Give yourself a fucking break. They decided it was better to spend the
money somewhere else.

--------> and just exactly WHO is responsible for maintaining roads,
highways, intrastates, bridges, etc? get a clue.

-------> and yeah right like if you had your way you would be spending our
money on infrastructure and not welfare, food stamps, and all the other
leftist crap you believe in. I'm betting that before you were told by your
demolib masters what to post to the newsgroups you didn't even know what
"infrastructure" was.




.
Myal
2007-08-03 04:00:35 UTC
Permalink
Post by Red
Post by Too_Many_Tools
Post by Red
Bullshit deleted.
What kind of whiny babies are these liberal idiots? They want the
POTUS to have his finger in every pie and his hand patting every back
so that they can blame every negative incident on him. Yet, when POTUS
tries to spy on terrorists and gangsters, they cry that their freedom
is being infringed. Do they want a Nanny state or a free state, or
does it depend on if POTUS is riding an elephant or a jackasss.
Actually his comments are more true than you want to admit.
Any politician visit is carefully orchestrated...especially a
President's...and especially a President's whose popularity is at
RECORD LOWS.....especially during an election cycle for the White
House.
And of course with the BILLIONS being wasted in Iraq instead of being
used to rebuild infrastructure in the United States, President Bush is
very guilty in contributing to this disaster.
Yeah I know it's tough when a President is actually held accountable
for his mistakes.
TMT
Nanny or Free?
nanny means govt uses public money to maintain public property free
means govt spend public money on war ...
Red
2007-08-03 13:38:21 UTC
Permalink
Post by Myal
Post by Red
Post by Too_Many_Tools
Post by Red
Bullshit deleted.
What kind of whiny babies are these liberal idiots? They want the
POTUS to have his finger in every pie and his hand patting every back
so that they can blame every negative incident on him. Yet, when POTUS
tries to spy on terrorists and gangsters, they cry that their freedom
is being infringed. Do they want a Nanny state or a free state, or
does it depend on if POTUS is riding an elephant or a jackasss.
Actually his comments are more true than you want to admit.
Any politician visit is carefully orchestrated...especially a
President's...and especially a President's whose popularity is at
RECORD LOWS.....especially during an election cycle for the White
House.
And of course with the BILLIONS being wasted in Iraq instead of being
used to rebuild infrastructure in the United States, President Bush is
very guilty in contributing to this disaster.
Yeah I know it's tough when a President is actually held accountable
for his mistakes.
TMT
Nanny or Free?
nanny means govt uses public money to maintain public property free
means govt spend public money on war ...- Hide quoted text -
- Show quoted text -
Go back and reread what you wrote. You're a halfwit. Government is
not the be all to end all. Man at some point has to take personal
responsibility. The first thing is wait to see what happened to this
bridge not blame Bush. The engineers recently passed it as safe.
It's their asses on the line.
Bob Brock
2007-08-03 13:50:03 UTC
Permalink
Post by Red
Post by Myal
Post by Red
Post by Too_Many_Tools
Post by Red
Bullshit deleted.
What kind of whiny babies are these liberal idiots? They want the
POTUS to have his finger in every pie and his hand patting every back
so that they can blame every negative incident on him. Yet, when POTUS
tries to spy on terrorists and gangsters, they cry that their freedom
is being infringed. Do they want a Nanny state or a free state, or
does it depend on if POTUS is riding an elephant or a jackasss.
Actually his comments are more true than you want to admit.
Any politician visit is carefully orchestrated...especially a
President's...and especially a President's whose popularity is at
RECORD LOWS.....especially during an election cycle for the White
House.
And of course with the BILLIONS being wasted in Iraq instead of being
used to rebuild infrastructure in the United States, President Bush is
very guilty in contributing to this disaster.
Yeah I know it's tough when a President is actually held accountable
for his mistakes.
TMT
Nanny or Free?
nanny means govt uses public money to maintain public property free
means govt spend public money on war ...- Hide quoted text -
- Show quoted text -
Go back and reread what you wrote. You're a halfwit. Government is
not the be all to end all. Man at some point has to take personal
responsibility. The first thing is wait to see what happened to this
bridge not blame Bush. The engineers recently passed it as safe.
It's their asses on the line.
That's funny. I thought that they had found problems with the bridge when
it was inspected. Do you have a cite where they found the bridge to be
defect free?
Red
2007-08-03 18:50:00 UTC
Permalink
Post by Bob Brock
Post by Red
Post by Myal
Post by Red
Post by Too_Many_Tools
Post by Red
Bullshit deleted.
What kind of whiny babies are these liberal idiots? They want the
POTUS to have his finger in every pie and his hand patting every back
so that they can blame every negative incident on him. Yet, when POTUS
tries to spy on terrorists and gangsters, they cry that their freedom
is being infringed. Do they want a Nanny state or a free state, or
does it depend on if POTUS is riding an elephant or a jackasss.
Actually his comments are more true than you want to admit.
Any politician visit is carefully orchestrated...especially a
President's...and especially a President's whose popularity is at
RECORD LOWS.....especially during an election cycle for the White
House.
And of course with the BILLIONS being wasted in Iraq instead of being
used to rebuild infrastructure in the United States, President Bush is
very guilty in contributing to this disaster.
Yeah I know it's tough when a President is actually held accountable
for his mistakes.
TMT
Nanny or Free?
nanny means govt uses public money to maintain public property free
means govt spend public money on war ...- Hide quoted text -
- Show quoted text -
Go back and reread what you wrote. You're a halfwit. Government is
not the be all to end all. Man at some point has to take personal
responsibility. The first thing is wait to see what happened to this
bridge not blame Bush. The engineers recently passed it as safe.
It's their asses on the line.
That's funny. I thought that they had found problems with the bridge when
it was inspected. Do you have a cite where they found the bridge to be
defect free?- Hide quoted text -
- Show quoted text -
Well idiot they didn't close it, did they! More union work I'm sure.
Bob Brock
2007-08-03 19:20:14 UTC
Permalink
Post by Red
Post by Bob Brock
Post by Red
Post by Myal
Post by Red
Post by Too_Many_Tools
Post by Red
Bullshit deleted.
What kind of whiny babies are these liberal idiots? They want the
POTUS to have his finger in every pie and his hand patting every back
so that they can blame every negative incident on him. Yet, when POTUS
tries to spy on terrorists and gangsters, they cry that their freedom
is being infringed. Do they want a Nanny state or a free state, or
does it depend on if POTUS is riding an elephant or a jackasss.
Actually his comments are more true than you want to admit.
Any politician visit is carefully orchestrated...especially a
President's...and especially a President's whose popularity is at
RECORD LOWS.....especially during an election cycle for the White
House.
And of course with the BILLIONS being wasted in Iraq instead of being
used to rebuild infrastructure in the United States, President Bush is
very guilty in contributing to this disaster.
Yeah I know it's tough when a President is actually held accountable
for his mistakes.
TMT
Nanny or Free?
nanny means govt uses public money to maintain public property free
means govt spend public money on war ...- Hide quoted text -
- Show quoted text -
Go back and reread what you wrote. You're a halfwit. Government is
not the be all to end all. Man at some point has to take personal
responsibility. The first thing is wait to see what happened to this
bridge not blame Bush. The engineers recently passed it as safe.
It's their asses on the line.
That's funny. I thought that they had found problems with the bridge when
it was inspected. Do you have a cite where they found the bridge to be
defect free?- Hide quoted text -
- Show quoted text -
Well idiot they didn't close it, did they! More union work I'm sure.
Well, construction workers don't close bridges! Hell, even highway
engineers don't close interstates.
z***@netscape.net
2007-08-03 22:14:25 UTC
Permalink
Post by Bob Brock
Post by Red
Post by Bob Brock
Post by Red
Post by Myal
Post by Red
Post by Too_Many_Tools
Post by Red
Bullshit deleted.
What kind of whiny babies are these liberal idiots? They want the
POTUS to have his finger in every pie and his hand patting every back
so that they can blame every negative incident on him. Yet, when POTUS
tries to spy on terrorists and gangsters, they cry that their freedom
is being infringed. Do they want a Nanny state or a free state, or
does it depend on if POTUS is riding an elephant or a jackasss.
Actually his comments are more true than you want to admit.
Any politician visit is carefully orchestrated...especially a
President's...and especially a President's whose popularity is at
RECORD LOWS.....especially during an election cycle for the White
House.
And of course with the BILLIONS being wasted in Iraq instead of being
used to rebuild infrastructure in the United States, President Bush is
very guilty in contributing to this disaster.
Yeah I know it's tough when a President is actually held accountable
for his mistakes.
TMT
Nanny or Free?
nanny means govt uses public money to maintain public property free
means govt spend public money on war ...- Hide quoted text -
- Show quoted text -
Go back and reread what you wrote. You're a halfwit. Government is
not the be all to end all. Man at some point has to take personal
responsibility. The first thing is wait to see what happened to this
bridge not blame Bush. The engineers recently passed it as safe.
It's their asses on the line.
That's funny. I thought that they had found problems with the bridge when
it was inspected. Do you have a cite where they found the bridge to be
defect free?- Hide quoted text -
- Show quoted text -
Well idiot they didn't close it, did they! More union work I'm sure.
Well, construction workers don't close bridges! Hell, even highway
engineers don't close interstates.- Hide quoted text -
Well, not really. Since they invented union joints
for union workers, and Usenet complaint departments
for morons.
Post by Bob Brock
- Show quoted text -
Red
2007-08-03 23:08:42 UTC
Permalink
Post by Bob Brock
Post by Red
Post by Bob Brock
Post by Red
Post by Myal
Post by Red
Post by Too_Many_Tools
Post by Red
Bullshit deleted.
What kind of whiny babies are these liberal idiots? They want the
POTUS to have his finger in every pie and his hand patting every back
so that they can blame every negative incident on him. Yet, when POTUS
tries to spy on terrorists and gangsters, they cry that their freedom
is being infringed. Do they want a Nanny state or a free state, or
does it depend on if POTUS is riding an elephant or a jackasss.
Actually his comments are more true than you want to admit.
Any politician visit is carefully orchestrated...especially a
President's...and especially a President's whose popularity is at
RECORD LOWS.....especially during an election cycle for the White
House.
And of course with the BILLIONS being wasted in Iraq instead of being
used to rebuild infrastructure in the United States, President Bush is
very guilty in contributing to this disaster.
Yeah I know it's tough when a President is actually held accountable
for his mistakes.
TMT
Nanny or Free?
nanny means govt uses public money to maintain public property free
means govt spend public money on war ...- Hide quoted text -
- Show quoted text -
Go back and reread what you wrote. You're a halfwit. Government is
not the be all to end all. Man at some point has to take personal
responsibility. The first thing is wait to see what happened to this
bridge not blame Bush. The engineers recently passed it as safe.
It's their asses on the line.
That's funny. I thought that they had found problems with the bridge when
it was inspected. Do you have a cite where they found the bridge to be
defect free?- Hide quoted text -
- Show quoted text -
Well idiot they didn't close it, did they! More union work I'm sure.
Well, construction workers don't close bridges! Hell, even highway
engineers don't close interstates.- Hide quoted text -
- Show quoted text -
Well then don't complain.
Bob Brock
2007-08-03 23:21:17 UTC
Permalink
Post by Red
Post by Bob Brock
Post by Red
Post by Bob Brock
Post by Red
Post by Myal
Post by Red
Post by Too_Many_Tools
Post by Red
Bullshit deleted.
What kind of whiny babies are these liberal idiots? They want the
POTUS to have his finger in every pie and his hand patting every back
so that they can blame every negative incident on him. Yet, when POTUS
tries to spy on terrorists and gangsters, they cry that their freedom
is being infringed. Do they want a Nanny state or a free state, or
does it depend on if POTUS is riding an elephant or a jackasss.
Actually his comments are more true than you want to admit.
Any politician visit is carefully orchestrated...especially a
President's...and especially a President's whose popularity is at
RECORD LOWS.....especially during an election cycle for the White
House.
And of course with the BILLIONS being wasted in Iraq instead of being
used to rebuild infrastructure in the United States, President
Bush
is
very guilty in contributing to this disaster.
Yeah I know it's tough when a President is actually held accountable
for his mistakes.
TMT
Nanny or Free?
nanny means govt uses public money to maintain public property free
means govt spend public money on war ...- Hide quoted text -
- Show quoted text -
Go back and reread what you wrote. You're a halfwit. Government is
not the be all to end all. Man at some point has to take personal
responsibility. The first thing is wait to see what happened to this
bridge not blame Bush. The engineers recently passed it as safe.
It's their asses on the line.
That's funny. I thought that they had found problems with the bridge when
it was inspected. Do you have a cite where they found the bridge to be
defect free?- Hide quoted text -
- Show quoted text -
Well idiot they didn't close it, did they! More union work I'm sure.
Well, construction workers don't close bridges! Hell, even highway
engineers don't close interstates.- Hide quoted text -
- Show quoted text -
Well then don't complain.
Why should I complain? You're the idiot.
Myal
2007-08-04 00:03:46 UTC
Permalink
Post by Bob Brock
Post by Red
Post by Bob Brock
Post by Red
Post by Myal
Post by Red
Post by Too_Many_Tools
Post by Red
Bullshit deleted.
What kind of whiny babies are these liberal idiots? They want the
POTUS to have his finger in every pie and his hand patting every back
so that they can blame every negative incident on him. Yet, when POTUS
tries to spy on terrorists and gangsters, they cry that their freedom
is being infringed. Do they want a Nanny state or a free state, or
does it depend on if POTUS is riding an elephant or a jackasss.
Actually his comments are more true than you want to admit.
Any politician visit is carefully orchestrated...especially a
President's...and especially a President's whose popularity is at
RECORD LOWS.....especially during an election cycle for the White
House.
And of course with the BILLIONS being wasted in Iraq instead of being
used to rebuild infrastructure in the United States, President Bush is
very guilty in contributing to this disaster.
Yeah I know it's tough when a President is actually held accountable
for his mistakes.
TMT
Nanny or Free?
nanny means govt uses public money to maintain public property free
means govt spend public money on war ...- Hide quoted text -
- Show quoted text -
Go back and reread what you wrote. You're a halfwit. Government is
not the be all to end all. Man at some point has to take personal
responsibility. The first thing is wait to see what happened to this
bridge not blame Bush. The engineers recently passed it as safe.
It's their asses on the line.
That's funny. I thought that they had found problems with the bridge when
it was inspected. Do you have a cite where they found the bridge to be
defect free?- Hide quoted text -
- Show quoted text -
Well idiot they didn't close it, did they! More union work I'm sure.
Well, construction workers don't close bridges! Hell, even highway
engineers don't close interstates.
its the nameless faceless "they" that does it ... red hasnt got a clue ,
he is another stuart grey kinda guy
Myal
2007-08-03 15:08:24 UTC
Permalink
Post by Red
Post by Myal
Post by Red
Post by Too_Many_Tools
Post by Red
Bullshit deleted.
What kind of whiny babies are these liberal idiots? They want the
POTUS to have his finger in every pie and his hand patting every back
so that they can blame every negative incident on him. Yet, when POTUS
tries to spy on terrorists and gangsters, they cry that their freedom
is being infringed. Do they want a Nanny state or a free state, or
does it depend on if POTUS is riding an elephant or a jackasss.
Actually his comments are more true than you want to admit.
Any politician visit is carefully orchestrated...especially a
President's...and especially a President's whose popularity is at
RECORD LOWS.....especially during an election cycle for the White
House.
And of course with the BILLIONS being wasted in Iraq instead of being
used to rebuild infrastructure in the United States, President Bush is
very guilty in contributing to this disaster.
Yeah I know it's tough when a President is actually held accountable
for his mistakes.
TMT
Nanny or Free?
nanny means govt uses public money to maintain public property free
means govt spend public money on war ...- Hide quoted text -
- Show quoted text -
Go back and reread what you wrote. You're a halfwit. Government is
not the be all to end all. Man at some point has to take personal
responsibility.
OK , Ill play , please do tell , who is responsible for public roads if
not government ??

is america SO primitive that the bridge users are expected to bring
their own steel and welders to make repairs to the bridge before using it ??


The first thing is wait to see what happened to this
Post by Red
bridge not blame Bush. The engineers recently passed it as safe.
It's their asses on the line.
Oh , I see , another bush bot ... everything is about bush , its all
about bush poor lil bush ...

dude , its a bridge , it collapsed , it had been found to be structuraly
inadaquate years before , traffic dont get less and lighter , it gets
more n heavier as time goes on ...

the govt body responsible didnt do its fucking job and as usualy people
died , but its worth the price cos now there be a new bridge , nothing
gets done till people die ...

yeah , OK ..
Red
2007-08-03 18:51:54 UTC
Permalink
Post by Myal
Post by Red
Post by Myal
Post by Red
Post by Too_Many_Tools
Post by Red
Bullshit deleted.
What kind of whiny babies are these liberal idiots? They want the
POTUS to have his finger in every pie and his hand patting every back
so that they can blame every negative incident on him. Yet, when POTUS
tries to spy on terrorists and gangsters, they cry that their freedom
is being infringed. Do they want a Nanny state or a free state, or
does it depend on if POTUS is riding an elephant or a jackasss.
Actually his comments are more true than you want to admit.
Any politician visit is carefully orchestrated...especially a
President's...and especially a President's whose popularity is at
RECORD LOWS.....especially during an election cycle for the White
House.
And of course with the BILLIONS being wasted in Iraq instead of being
used to rebuild infrastructure in the United States, President Bush is
very guilty in contributing to this disaster.
Yeah I know it's tough when a President is actually held accountable
for his mistakes.
TMT
Nanny or Free?
nanny means govt uses public money to maintain public property free
means govt spend public money on war ...- Hide quoted text -
- Show quoted text -
Go back and reread what you wrote. You're a halfwit. Government is
not the be all to end all. Man at some point has to take personal
responsibility.
OK , Ill play , please do tell , who is responsible for public roads if
not government ??
is america SO primitive that the bridge users are expected to bring
their own steel and welders to make repairs to the bridge before using it ??
The first thing is wait to see what happened to this
Post by Red
bridge not blame Bush. The engineers recently passed it as safe.
It's their asses on the line.
Oh , I see , another bush bot ... everything is about bush , its all
about bush poor lil bush ...
dude , its a bridge , it collapsed , it had been found to be structuraly
inadaquate years before , traffic dont get less and lighter , it gets
more n heavier as time goes on ...
the govt body responsible didnt do its fucking job and as usualy people
died , but its worth the price cos now there be a new bridge , nothing
gets done till people die ...
yeah , OK ..- Hide quoted text -
- Show quoted text -
You liberal idiots rely on government to solve all your problems.
Bridges have fallen before, it's nothing new and guess what, it will
happen again. The buck stops where the people that inspected it and
kept it open. If it was that dangerous why didn't they close it.
That's what I thought. Bush derangement syndrome. Besides, I didn't
know you people worked.
Bob Brock
2007-08-03 19:20:47 UTC
Permalink
Post by Red
Post by Myal
Post by Red
Post by Myal
Post by Red
Post by Too_Many_Tools
Post by Red
Bullshit deleted.
What kind of whiny babies are these liberal idiots? They want the
POTUS to have his finger in every pie and his hand patting every back
so that they can blame every negative incident on him. Yet, when POTUS
tries to spy on terrorists and gangsters, they cry that their freedom
is being infringed. Do they want a Nanny state or a free state, or
does it depend on if POTUS is riding an elephant or a jackasss.
Actually his comments are more true than you want to admit.
Any politician visit is carefully orchestrated...especially a
President's...and especially a President's whose popularity is at
RECORD LOWS.....especially during an election cycle for the White
House.
And of course with the BILLIONS being wasted in Iraq instead of being
used to rebuild infrastructure in the United States, President Bush is
very guilty in contributing to this disaster.
Yeah I know it's tough when a President is actually held accountable
for his mistakes.
TMT
Nanny or Free?
nanny means govt uses public money to maintain public property free
means govt spend public money on war ...- Hide quoted text -
- Show quoted text -
Go back and reread what you wrote. You're a halfwit. Government is
not the be all to end all. Man at some point has to take personal
responsibility.
OK , Ill play , please do tell , who is responsible for public roads if
not government ??
is america SO primitive that the bridge users are expected to bring
their own steel and welders to make repairs to the bridge before using it ??
The first thing is wait to see what happened to this
Post by Red
bridge not blame Bush. The engineers recently passed it as safe.
It's their asses on the line.
Oh , I see , another bush bot ... everything is about bush , its all
about bush poor lil bush ...
dude , its a bridge , it collapsed , it had been found to be structuraly
inadaquate years before , traffic dont get less and lighter , it gets
more n heavier as time goes on ...
the govt body responsible didnt do its fucking job and as usualy people
died , but its worth the price cos now there be a new bridge , nothing
gets done till people die ...
yeah , OK ..- Hide quoted text -
- Show quoted text -
You liberal idiots rely on government to solve all your problems.
Bridges have fallen before, it's nothing new and guess what, it will
happen again. The buck stops where the people that inspected it and
kept it open. If it was that dangerous why didn't they close it.
That's what I thought. Bush derangement syndrome. Besides, I didn't
know you people worked.
And you do?
Myal
2007-08-04 00:02:43 UTC
Permalink
Post by Red
Post by Myal
Post by Red
Post by Myal
Post by Red
Post by Too_Many_Tools
Post by Red
Bullshit deleted.
What kind of whiny babies are these liberal idiots? They want the
POTUS to have his finger in every pie and his hand patting every back
so that they can blame every negative incident on him. Yet, when POTUS
tries to spy on terrorists and gangsters, they cry that their freedom
is being infringed. Do they want a Nanny state or a free state, or
does it depend on if POTUS is riding an elephant or a jackasss.
Actually his comments are more true than you want to admit.
Any politician visit is carefully orchestrated...especially a
President's...and especially a President's whose popularity is at
RECORD LOWS.....especially during an election cycle for the White
House.
And of course with the BILLIONS being wasted in Iraq instead of being
used to rebuild infrastructure in the United States, President Bush is
very guilty in contributing to this disaster.
Yeah I know it's tough when a President is actually held accountable
for his mistakes.
TMT
Nanny or Free?
nanny means govt uses public money to maintain public property free
means govt spend public money on war ...- Hide quoted text -
- Show quoted text -
Go back and reread what you wrote. You're a halfwit. Government is
not the be all to end all. Man at some point has to take personal
responsibility.
OK , Ill play , please do tell , who is responsible for public roads if
not government ??
is america SO primitive that the bridge users are expected to bring
their own steel and welders to make repairs to the bridge before using it ??
The first thing is wait to see what happened to this
Post by Red
bridge not blame Bush. The engineers recently passed it as safe.
It's their asses on the line.
Oh , I see , another bush bot ... everything is about bush , its all
about bush poor lil bush ...
dude , its a bridge , it collapsed , it had been found to be structuraly
inadaquate years before , traffic dont get less and lighter , it gets
more n heavier as time goes on ...
the govt body responsible didnt do its fucking job and as usualy people
died , but its worth the price cos now there be a new bridge , nothing
gets done till people die ...
yeah , OK ..- Hide quoted text -
- Show quoted text -
You liberal idiots rely on government to solve all your problems.
Bridges have fallen before, it's nothing new and guess what, it will
happen again. The buck stops where the people that inspected it and
kept it open.
are these bridges privately owned , or govt owed "public property ?"


If it was that dangerous why didn't they close it.
Post by Red
That's what I thought. Bush derangement syndrome. Besides, I didn't
know you people worked.
you keep on and on defending bush when I havent attacked the runty
little bastard for the bridge ...

you are fixated

to you , bush = the entire govt


wake up dimwit
h***@hotmail.com
2007-08-04 01:35:54 UTC
Permalink
Post by Red
Post by Myal
Post by Red
Post by Too_Many_Tools
Post by Red
Bullshit deleted.
What kind of whiny babies are these liberal idiots? They want the
POTUS to have his finger in every pie and his hand patting every back
so that they can blame every negative incident on him. Yet, when POTUS
tries to spy on terrorists and gangsters, they cry that their freedom
is being infringed. Do they want a Nanny state or a free state, or
does it depend on if POTUS is riding an elephant or a jackasss.
Actually his comments are more true than you want to admit.
Any politician visit is carefully orchestrated...especially a
President's...and especially a President's whose popularity is at
RECORD LOWS.....especially during an election cycle for the White
House.
And of course with the BILLIONS being wasted in Iraq instead of being
used to rebuild infrastructure in the United States, President Bush is
very guilty in contributing to this disaster.
Yeah I know it's tough when a President is actually held accountable
for his mistakes.
TMT
Nanny or Free?
nanny means govt uses public money to maintain public property free
means govt spend public money on war ...- Hide quoted text -
- Show quoted text -
Go back and reread what you wrote. You're a halfwit.
Be nice, english is a second language for Myal. Aussie is his first
language.
Post by Red
Government is
not the be all to end all. Man at some point has to take personal
responsibility. The first thing is wait to see what happened to this
bridge not blame Bush. The engineers recently passed it as safe.
It's their asses on the line.-
But Bush is at war with science and engineering....
E***@spamblock.panix.com
2007-08-03 18:25:19 UTC
Permalink
Post by Red
Nanny or Free?
Nobody is giving a good answer. What you are getting, instead, is the type
of answer one gets when one asks a stupid question.
--
The whole problem with the world is that fools and fanatics are always so
certain of themselves, but wiser people so full of doubts.
-- Bertrand Russel
Red
2007-08-03 18:52:38 UTC
Permalink
Post by E***@spamblock.panix.com
Post by Red
Nanny or Free?
Nobody is giving a good answer. What you are getting, instead, is the type
of answer one gets when one asks a stupid question.
--
The whole problem with the world is that fools and fanatics are always so
certain of themselves, but wiser people so full of doubts.
-- Bertrand Russel
So what other names do you post under!
Hhhhmmmmm.....
2007-08-03 23:29:53 UTC
Permalink
Post by Red
Bullshit deleted.
What kind of whiny babies are these liberal idiots? They want the
POTUS to have his finger in every pie and his hand patting every back
so that they can blame every negative incident on him. Yet, when POTUS
tries to spy on terrorists and gangsters, they cry that their freedom
is being infringed. Do they want a Nanny state or a free state, or
does it depend on if POTUS is riding an elephant or a jackasss.
Actually his comments are more true than you want to admit.

Any politician visit is carefully orchestrated...especially a
President's...and especially a President's whose popularity is at
RECORD LOWS.....especially during an election cycle for the White
House.

And of course with the BILLIONS being wasted in Iraq instead of being
used to rebuild infrastructure in the United States, President Bush is
very guilty in contributing to this disaster.

---->. huh?


Yeah I know it's tough

-----> what mistake? just WHO do you think is responsible for maintaining
highways, bridges, roads in this country?



.


TMT
Bob Brock
2007-08-03 23:32:10 UTC
Permalink
Post by Too_Many_Tools
Post by Red
Bullshit deleted.
What kind of whiny babies are these liberal idiots? They want the
POTUS to have his finger in every pie and his hand patting every back
so that they can blame every negative incident on him. Yet, when POTUS
tries to spy on terrorists and gangsters, they cry that their freedom
is being infringed. Do they want a Nanny state or a free state, or
does it depend on if POTUS is riding an elephant or a jackasss.
Actually his comments are more true than you want to admit.
Any politician visit is carefully orchestrated...especially a
President's...and especially a President's whose popularity is at
RECORD LOWS.....especially during an election cycle for the White
House.
And of course with the BILLIONS being wasted in Iraq instead of being
used to rebuild infrastructure in the United States, President Bush is
very guilty in contributing to this disaster.
---->. huh?
Yeah I know it's tough
-----> what mistake? just WHO do you think is responsible for maintaining
highways, bridges, roads in this country?
Not to defend Bush, but neglecting infrasturcture started before he got in
office. It just continued after he got in.
Hhhhmmmmm.....
2007-08-05 12:45:49 UTC
Permalink
Post by Too_Many_Tools
Post by Red
Bullshit deleted.
What kind of whiny babies are these liberal idiots? They want the
POTUS to have his finger in every pie and his hand patting every back
so that they can blame every negative incident on him. Yet, when POTUS
tries to spy on terrorists and gangsters, they cry that their freedom
is being infringed. Do they want a Nanny state or a free state, or
does it depend on if POTUS is riding an elephant or a jackasss.
Actually his comments are more true than you want to admit.
Any politician visit is carefully orchestrated...especially a
President's...and especially a President's whose popularity is at
RECORD LOWS.....especially during an election cycle for the White
House.
And of course with the BILLIONS being wasted in Iraq instead of being
used to rebuild infrastructure in the United States, President Bush is
very guilty in contributing to this disaster.
---->. huh?
Yeah I know it's tough
-----> what mistake? just WHO do you think is responsible for maintaining
highways, bridges, roads in this country?
Not to defend Bush, but neglecting infrasturcture started before he got in
office. It just continued after he got in.

-----> it is a STATE responsibility - to inspect, maintain, manage
infrastructure projects. The Feds just redistribute tax money. always has
been.
Myal
2007-08-05 13:11:59 UTC
Permalink
Post by Bob Brock
Post by Too_Many_Tools
Post by Red
Bullshit deleted.
What kind of whiny babies are these liberal idiots? They want the
POTUS to have his finger in every pie and his hand patting every back
so that they can blame every negative incident on him. Yet, when POTUS
tries to spy on terrorists and gangsters, they cry that their freedom
is being infringed. Do they want a Nanny state or a free state, or
does it depend on if POTUS is riding an elephant or a jackasss.
Actually his comments are more true than you want to admit.
Any politician visit is carefully orchestrated...especially a
President's...and especially a President's whose popularity is at
RECORD LOWS.....especially during an election cycle for the White
House.
And of course with the BILLIONS being wasted in Iraq instead of being
used to rebuild infrastructure in the United States, President Bush is
very guilty in contributing to this disaster.
---->. huh?
Yeah I know it's tough
-----> what mistake? just WHO do you think is responsible for maintaining
highways, bridges, roads in this country?
Not to defend Bush, but neglecting infrasturcture started before he got in
office. It just continued after he got in.
-----> it is a STATE responsibility - to inspect, maintain, manage
infrastructure projects. The Feds just redistribute tax money. always has
been.
state ... what tho ?

just anyone who wants to is supposed to do what they reckon is right on
a bridge ?

or is their some kind of body in charge of the bridges ?
Hhhhmmmmm.....
2007-08-06 12:22:07 UTC
Permalink
Post by Bob Brock
Post by Too_Many_Tools
Post by Red
Bullshit deleted.
What kind of whiny babies are these liberal idiots? They want the
POTUS to have his finger in every pie and his hand patting every back
so that they can blame every negative incident on him. Yet, when POTUS
tries to spy on terrorists and gangsters, they cry that their freedom
is being infringed. Do they want a Nanny state or a free state, or
does it depend on if POTUS is riding an elephant or a jackasss.
Actually his comments are more true than you want to admit.
Any politician visit is carefully orchestrated...especially a
President's...and especially a President's whose popularity is at
RECORD LOWS.....especially during an election cycle for the White
House.
And of course with the BILLIONS being wasted in Iraq instead of being
used to rebuild infrastructure in the United States, President Bush is
very guilty in contributing to this disaster.
---->. huh?
Yeah I know it's tough
-----> what mistake? just WHO do you think is responsible for maintaining
highways, bridges, roads in this country?
Not to defend Bush, but neglecting infrasturcture started before he got in
office. It just continued after he got in.
-----> it is a STATE responsibility - to inspect, maintain, manage
infrastructure projects. The Feds just redistribute tax money. always has
been.
state ... what tho ?

just anyone who wants to is supposed to do what they reckon is right on
a bridge ?

or is their some kind of body in charge of the bridges ?

------> every state I know about has some kind of department of
transportation. In California its called CalTrans. In Mississippi it's
called MDOT, for example. These departments are in charge of maintaining
state roads, bridges, and highway, and the intrastates. Counties are
responsible for county roads, cities are responsible for city streets.


.
Myal
2007-08-07 00:56:32 UTC
Permalink
Post by Myal
Post by Bob Brock
Post by Too_Many_Tools
Post by Red
Bullshit deleted.
What kind of whiny babies are these liberal idiots? They want the
POTUS to have his finger in every pie and his hand patting every back
so that they can blame every negative incident on him. Yet, when POTUS
tries to spy on terrorists and gangsters, they cry that their freedom
is being infringed. Do they want a Nanny state or a free state, or
does it depend on if POTUS is riding an elephant or a jackasss.
Actually his comments are more true than you want to admit.
Any politician visit is carefully orchestrated...especially a
President's...and especially a President's whose popularity is at
RECORD LOWS.....especially during an election cycle for the White
House.
And of course with the BILLIONS being wasted in Iraq instead of being
used to rebuild infrastructure in the United States, President Bush is
very guilty in contributing to this disaster.
---->. huh?
Yeah I know it's tough
-----> what mistake? just WHO do you think is responsible for maintaining
highways, bridges, roads in this country?
Not to defend Bush, but neglecting infrasturcture started before he got in
office. It just continued after he got in.
-----> it is a STATE responsibility - to inspect, maintain, manage
infrastructure projects. The Feds just redistribute tax money. always has
been.
state ... what tho ?
just anyone who wants to is supposed to do what they reckon is right on
a bridge ?
or is their some kind of body in charge of the bridges ?
------> every state I know about has some kind of department of
transportation. In California its called CalTrans. In Mississippi it's
called MDOT, for example. These departments are in charge of maintaining
state roads, bridges, and highway, and the intrastates. Counties are
responsible for county roads, cities are responsible for city streets.
.
who is charge of the departments ?

where does their funding come from ?
z***@netscape.net
2007-08-07 05:01:36 UTC
Permalink
Post by Myal
Post by Myal
Post by Bob Brock
Post by Too_Many_Tools
Post by Red
Bullshit deleted.
What kind of whiny babies are these liberal idiots? They want the
POTUS to have his finger in every pie and his hand patting every back
so that they can blame every negative incident on him. Yet, when POTUS
tries to spy on terrorists and gangsters, they cry that their freedom
is being infringed. Do they want a Nanny state or a free state, or
does it depend on if POTUS is riding an elephant or a jackasss.
Actually his comments are more true than you want to admit.
Any politician visit is carefully orchestrated...especially a
President's...and especially a President's whose popularity is at
RECORD LOWS.....especially during an election cycle for the White
House.
And of course with the BILLIONS being wasted in Iraq instead of being
used to rebuild infrastructure in the United States, President Bush is
very guilty in contributing to this disaster.
---->. huh?
Yeah I know it's tough
-----> what mistake? just WHO do you think is responsible for maintaining
highways, bridges, roads in this country?
Not to defend Bush, but neglecting infrasturcture started before he got in
office. It just continued after he got in.
-----> it is a STATE responsibility - to inspect, maintain, manage
infrastructure projects. The Feds just redistribute tax money. always has
been.
state ... what tho ?
just anyone who wants to is supposed to do what they reckon is right on
a bridge ?
or is their some kind of body in charge of the bridges ?
------> every state I know about has some kind of department of
transportation. In California its called CalTrans. In Mississippi it's
called MDOT, for example. These departments are in charge of maintaining
state roads, bridges, and highway, and the intrastates. Counties are
responsible for county roads, cities are responsible for city streets.
.
who is charge of the departments ?
The states are in charge of the departments,
Just like they're in charge of the drinking water in every state.
Since bridges and drinking water are just about
the same thing.
Post by Myal
where does their funding come from ?- Hide quoted text -
- Show quoted text -
Myal
2007-08-07 05:24:24 UTC
Permalink
Post by z***@netscape.net
Post by Myal
Post by Myal
Post by Bob Brock
Post by Too_Many_Tools
Post by Red
Bullshit deleted.
What kind of whiny babies are these liberal idiots? They want the
POTUS to have his finger in every pie and his hand patting every back
so that they can blame every negative incident on him. Yet, when POTUS
tries to spy on terrorists and gangsters, they cry that their freedom
is being infringed. Do they want a Nanny state or a free state, or
does it depend on if POTUS is riding an elephant or a jackasss.
Actually his comments are more true than you want to admit.
Any politician visit is carefully orchestrated...especially a
President's...and especially a President's whose popularity is at
RECORD LOWS.....especially during an election cycle for the White
House.
And of course with the BILLIONS being wasted in Iraq instead of being
used to rebuild infrastructure in the United States, President Bush is
very guilty in contributing to this disaster.
---->. huh?
Yeah I know it's tough
-----> what mistake? just WHO do you think is responsible for maintaining
highways, bridges, roads in this country?
Not to defend Bush, but neglecting infrasturcture started before he got in
office. It just continued after he got in.
-----> it is a STATE responsibility - to inspect, maintain, manage
infrastructure projects. The Feds just redistribute tax money. always has
been.
state ... what tho ?
just anyone who wants to is supposed to do what they reckon is right on
a bridge ?
or is their some kind of body in charge of the bridges ?
------> every state I know about has some kind of department of
transportation. In California its called CalTrans. In Mississippi it's
called MDOT, for example. These departments are in charge of maintaining
state roads, bridges, and highway, and the intrastates. Counties are
responsible for county roads, cities are responsible for city streets.
.
who is charge of the departments ?
The states are in charge of the departments,
Just like they're in charge of the drinking water in every state.
Since bridges and drinking water are just about
the same thing.
last I saw , a state was an area marked out by borders ...

how is a chunk of land responsible for bridges ??

Im LOVING seeing you dudes tiptoing around and avoiding having to say
"government" here

its the government that carries the can , but you pissfart around finger
pointing and tiptoing to protect yer fucking precious politicians ...

why ?
Post by z***@netscape.net
Post by Myal
where does their funding come from ?- Hide quoted text -
- Show quoted text -
strabo
2007-08-07 07:04:52 UTC
Permalink
<snipped>
Post by Myal
Post by z***@netscape.net
Post by Myal
who is charge of the departments ?
The states are in charge of the departments,
Just like they're in charge of the drinking water in every state.
Since bridges and drinking water are just about
the same thing.
last I saw , a state was an area marked out by borders ...
how is a chunk of land responsible for bridges ??
Im LOVING seeing you dudes tiptoing around and avoiding having to say
"government" here
its the government that carries the can , but you pissfart around finger
pointing and tiptoing to protect yer fucking precious politicians ...
why ?
Post by z***@netscape.net
Post by Myal
where does their funding come from ?- Hide quoted text -
Briefly here's the way it works...

1. Each state is its own government and builds and maintains its
own roads and bridges. These are contained within each state.

States also make agreements with other states to connect or extend
a state's highways across multiple states. They split the costs.

State highways share a common numbering system which is different
from the one used by the Interstate Highway system (below).


2. In 1956 a national network of roads and bridges crisscrossing the
states was begun by agreement between the federal (central)
government and the individual state governments. This network is
known as the Interstate Highway system and is funded by the federal
government.

3. The federal government has responsibility for all navigable waterways
including bridges, dams, harbors, ports, etc. Some costs are split
between the feds and state governments.

The bridge that fell was part of the Interstate Highway system (I35).
It runs north/south into Texas. The federal government is the primary
responsible party.
Post by Myal
Post by z***@netscape.net
Post by Myal
- Show quoted text -
----== Posted via Newsfeeds.Com - Unlimited-Unrestricted-Secure Usenet News==----
http://www.newsfeeds.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! 120,000+ Newsgroups
----= East and West-Coast Server Farms - Total Privacy via Encryption =----
Hhhhmmmmm.....
2007-08-10 00:30:14 UTC
Permalink
<snipped>
Post by Myal
Post by z***@netscape.net
Post by Myal
who is charge of the departments ?
The states are in charge of the departments,
Just like they're in charge of the drinking water in every state.
Since bridges and drinking water are just about
the same thing.
last I saw , a state was an area marked out by borders ...
how is a chunk of land responsible for bridges ??
Im LOVING seeing you dudes tiptoing around and avoiding having to say
"government" here
its the government that carries the can , but you pissfart around finger
pointing and tiptoing to protect yer fucking precious politicians ...
why ?
Post by z***@netscape.net
Post by Myal
where does their funding come from ?- Hide quoted text -
Briefly here's the way it works...

1. Each state is its own government and builds and maintains its
own roads and bridges. These are contained within each state.

States also make agreements with other states to connect or extend
a state's highways across multiple states. They split the costs.

State highways share a common numbering system which is different
from the one used by the Interstate Highway system (below).


2. In 1956 a national network of roads and bridges crisscrossing the
states was begun by agreement between the federal (central)
government and the individual state governments. This network is
known as the Interstate Highway system and is funded by the federal
government.

3. The federal government has responsibility for all navigable waterways
including bridges, dams, harbors, ports, etc. Some costs are split
between the feds and state governments.

---> and just eaxctly WHICH federal deparment is charged with the inspection
of bridges? betcha this is a STATE responsibility. Sure is here in
Mississippi. And In California.


The bridge that fell was part of the Interstate Highway system (I35).
It runs north/south into Texas. The federal government is the primary
responsible party.
Post by Myal
Post by z***@netscape.net
Post by Myal
- Show quoted text -
----== Posted via Newsfeeds.Com - Unlimited-Unrestricted-Secure Usenet
News==----
http://www.newsfeeds.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! 120,000+
Newsgroups
----= East and West-Coast Server Farms - Total Privacy via Encryption =----
z***@netscape.net
2007-08-07 21:25:01 UTC
Permalink
Post by Myal
Post by z***@netscape.net
Post by Myal
Post by Myal
Post by Bob Brock
Post by Too_Many_Tools
Post by Red
Bullshit deleted.
What kind of whiny babies are these liberal idiots? They want the
POTUS to have his finger in every pie and his hand patting every back
so that they can blame every negative incident on him. Yet, when POTUS
tries to spy on terrorists and gangsters, they cry that their freedom
is being infringed. Do they want a Nanny state or a free state, or
does it depend on if POTUS is riding an elephant or a jackasss.
Actually his comments are more true than you want to admit.
Any politician visit is carefully orchestrated...especially a
President's...and especially a President's whose popularity is at
RECORD LOWS.....especially during an election cycle for the White
House.
And of course with the BILLIONS being wasted in Iraq instead of being
used to rebuild infrastructure in the United States, President Bush is
very guilty in contributing to this disaster.
---->. huh?
Yeah I know it's tough
-----> what mistake? just WHO do you think is responsible for maintaining
highways, bridges, roads in this country?
Not to defend Bush, but neglecting infrasturcture started before he got in
office. It just continued after he got in.
-----> it is a STATE responsibility - to inspect, maintain, manage
infrastructure projects. The Feds just redistribute tax money. always has
been.
state ... what tho ?
just anyone who wants to is supposed to do what they reckon is right on
a bridge ?
or is their some kind of body in charge of the bridges ?
------> every state I know about has some kind of department of
transportation. In California its called CalTrans. In Mississippi it's
called MDOT, for example. These departments are in charge of maintaining
state roads, bridges, and highway, and the intrastates. Counties are
responsible for county roads, cities are responsible for city streets.
.
who is charge of the departments ?
The states are in charge of the departments,
Just like they're in charge of the drinking water in every state.
Since bridges and drinking water are just about
the same thing.
last I saw , a state was an area marked out by borders ...
Last I saw, any idiot patch of the the entire universe
is an area marked out by borders.
Which is the reason we actually managed to map
out the Dark Side of the moon, rather than the
moron-retarded Washington D.C. / CIA side of the moon.
Post by Myal
how is a chunk of land responsible for bridges ??
Im LOVING seeing you dudes tiptoing around and avoiding having to say
"government" here
its the government that carries the can , but you pissfart around finger
pointing and tiptoing to protect yer fucking precious politicians ...
why ?
Post by z***@netscape.net
Post by Myal
where does their funding come from ?- Hide quoted text -
- Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -
- Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -
- Show quoted text -
Hhhhmmmmm.....
2007-08-16 15:39:25 UTC
Permalink
Post by Myal
Post by z***@netscape.net
Post by Myal
Post by Myal
Post by Bob Brock
Post by Too_Many_Tools
Post by Red
Bullshit deleted.
What kind of whiny babies are these liberal idiots? They want the
POTUS to have his finger in every pie and his hand patting every back
so that they can blame every negative incident on him. Yet, when POTUS
tries to spy on terrorists and gangsters, they cry that their freedom
is being infringed. Do they want a Nanny state or a free state, or
does it depend on if POTUS is riding an elephant or a jackasss.
Actually his comments are more true than you want to admit.
Any politician visit is carefully orchestrated...especially a
President's...and especially a President's whose popularity is at
RECORD LOWS.....especially during an election cycle for the White
House.
And of course with the BILLIONS being wasted in Iraq instead of being
used to rebuild infrastructure in the United States, President Bush is
very guilty in contributing to this disaster.
---->. huh?
Yeah I know it's tough
-----> what mistake? just WHO do you think is responsible for maintaining
highways, bridges, roads in this country?
Not to defend Bush, but neglecting infrasturcture started before he got in
office. It just continued after he got in.
-----> it is a STATE responsibility - to inspect, maintain, manage
infrastructure projects. The Feds just redistribute tax money. always has
been.
state ... what tho ?
just anyone who wants to is supposed to do what they reckon is right on
a bridge ?
or is their some kind of body in charge of the bridges ?
------> every state I know about has some kind of department of
transportation. In California its called CalTrans. In Mississippi it's
called MDOT, for example. These departments are in charge of maintaining
state roads, bridges, and highway, and the intrastates. Counties are
responsible for county roads, cities are responsible for city streets.
.
who is charge of the departments ?
The states are in charge of the departments,
Just like they're in charge of the drinking water in every state.
Since bridges and drinking water are just about
the same thing.
last I saw , a state was an area marked out by borders ...
Last I saw, any idiot patch of the the entire universe
is an area marked out by borders.
Which is the reason we actually managed to map
out the Dark Side of the moon, rather than the
moron-retarded Washington D.C. / CIA side of the moon.

------------> to quote a caveman... "what?"
Post by Myal
how is a chunk of land responsible for bridges ??
Im LOVING seeing you dudes tiptoing around and avoiding having to say
"government" here
its the government that carries the can , but you pissfart around finger
pointing and tiptoing to protect yer fucking precious politicians ...
why ?
Post by z***@netscape.net
Post by Myal
where does their funding come from ?- Hide quoted text -
- Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -
- Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -
- Show quoted text -
z***@netscape.net
2007-08-16 18:19:51 UTC
Permalink
Post by z***@netscape.net
Post by Myal
Post by z***@netscape.net
Post by Myal
Post by Myal
Post by Bob Brock
Post by Too_Many_Tools
Post by Red
Bullshit deleted.
What kind of whiny babies are these liberal idiots? They want the
POTUS to have his finger in every pie and his hand patting every back
so that they can blame every negative incident on him. Yet, when POTUS
tries to spy on terrorists and gangsters, they cry that their freedom
is being infringed. Do they want a Nanny state or a free state, or
does it depend on if POTUS is riding an elephant or a jackasss.
Actually his comments are more true than you want to admit.
Any politician visit is carefully orchestrated...especially a
President's...and especially a President's whose popularity is at
RECORD LOWS.....especially during an election cycle for the White
House.
And of course with the BILLIONS being wasted in Iraq instead of being
used to rebuild infrastructure in the United States, President Bush is
very guilty in contributing to this disaster.
---->. huh?
Yeah I know it's tough
-----> what mistake? just WHO do you think is responsible for maintaining
highways, bridges, roads in this country?
Not to defend Bush, but neglecting infrasturcture started before he got in
office. It just continued after he got in.
-----> it is a STATE responsibility - to inspect, maintain, manage
infrastructure projects. The Feds just redistribute tax money. always has
been.
state ... what tho ?
just anyone who wants to is supposed to do what they reckon is right on
a bridge ?
or is their some kind of body in charge of the bridges ?
------> every state I know about has some kind of department of
transportation. In California its called CalTrans. In Mississippi it's
called MDOT, for example. These departments are in charge of maintaining
state roads, bridges, and highway, and the intrastates. Counties are
responsible for county roads, cities are responsible for city streets.
.
who is charge of the departments ?
The states are in charge of the departments,
Just like they're in charge of the drinking water in every state.
Since bridges and drinking water are just about
the same thing.
last I saw , a state was an area marked out by borders ...
Last I saw, any idiot patch of the the entire universe
is an area marked out by borders.
Which is the reason we actually managed to map
out the Dark Side of the moon, rather than the
moron-retarded Washington D.C. / CIA side of the moon.
------------> to quote a caveman... "what?"
No reason to quote the cavemen.
Since ABC sports did that for us, quite repetively and
consistently,
after we invented lasers, landed on the moon, and invented GPS.
Post by z***@netscape.net
Post by Myal
how is a chunk of land responsible for bridges ??
Im LOVING seeing you dudes tiptoing around and avoiding having to say
"government" here
its the government that carries the can , but you pissfart around finger
pointing and tiptoing to protect yer fucking precious politicians ...
why ?
Post by z***@netscape.net
Post by Myal
where does their funding come from ?- Hide quoted text -
- Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -
- Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -
- Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -
- Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -
- Show quoted text -
Hhhhmmmmm.....
2007-08-10 00:27:53 UTC
Permalink
Post by z***@netscape.net
Post by Myal
Post by Myal
Post by Bob Brock
Post by Too_Many_Tools
Post by Red
Bullshit deleted.
What kind of whiny babies are these liberal idiots? They want the
POTUS to have his finger in every pie and his hand patting every back
so that they can blame every negative incident on him. Yet, when POTUS
tries to spy on terrorists and gangsters, they cry that their freedom
is being infringed. Do they want a Nanny state or a free state, or
does it depend on if POTUS is riding an elephant or a jackasss.
Actually his comments are more true than you want to admit.
Any politician visit is carefully orchestrated...especially a
President's...and especially a President's whose popularity is at
RECORD LOWS.....especially during an election cycle for the White
House.
And of course with the BILLIONS being wasted in Iraq instead of being
used to rebuild infrastructure in the United States, President Bush is
very guilty in contributing to this disaster.
---->. huh?
Yeah I know it's tough
-----> what mistake? just WHO do you think is responsible for maintaining
highways, bridges, roads in this country?
Not to defend Bush, but neglecting infrasturcture started before he got in
office. It just continued after he got in.
-----> it is a STATE responsibility - to inspect, maintain, manage
infrastructure projects. The Feds just redistribute tax money. always has
been.
state ... what tho ?
just anyone who wants to is supposed to do what they reckon is right on
a bridge ?
or is their some kind of body in charge of the bridges ?
------> every state I know about has some kind of department of
transportation. In California its called CalTrans. In Mississippi it's
called MDOT, for example. These departments are in charge of maintaining
state roads, bridges, and highway, and the intrastates. Counties are
responsible for county roads, cities are responsible for city streets.
.
who is charge of the departments ?
The states are in charge of the departments,
Just like they're in charge of the drinking water in every state.
Since bridges and drinking water are just about
the same thing.
last I saw , a state was an area marked out by borders ...

how is a chunk of land responsible for bridges ??


---> take a fucking civics class sometime and learn how things work, you
moron


Im LOVING seeing you dudes tiptoing around and avoiding having to say
"government" here

--->STATE government, you moron

its the government that carries the can , but you pissfart around finger
pointing and tiptoing to protect yer fucking precious politicians ...

--- > have you EVER read the Constitution? You DO know the difference
between STATE and FEDERAL (and LOCAL, for that matter)

---> moron


why ?
Post by z***@netscape.net
Post by Myal
where does their funding come from ?- Hide quoted text -
- Show quoted text -
Myal
2007-08-10 03:51:33 UTC
Permalink
Post by Myal
Post by z***@netscape.net
Post by Myal
Post by Myal
Post by Bob Brock
Post by Too_Many_Tools
Post by Red
Bullshit deleted.
What kind of whiny babies are these liberal idiots? They want the
POTUS to have his finger in every pie and his hand patting every back
so that they can blame every negative incident on him. Yet, when POTUS
tries to spy on terrorists and gangsters, they cry that their freedom
is being infringed. Do they want a Nanny state or a free state, or
does it depend on if POTUS is riding an elephant or a jackasss.
Actually his comments are more true than you want to admit.
Any politician visit is carefully orchestrated...especially a
President's...and especially a President's whose popularity is at
RECORD LOWS.....especially during an election cycle for the White
House.
And of course with the BILLIONS being wasted in Iraq instead of being
used to rebuild infrastructure in the United States, President Bush is
very guilty in contributing to this disaster.
---->. huh?
Yeah I know it's tough
-----> what mistake? just WHO do you think is responsible for maintaining
highways, bridges, roads in this country?
Not to defend Bush, but neglecting infrasturcture started before he got in
office. It just continued after he got in.
-----> it is a STATE responsibility - to inspect, maintain, manage
infrastructure projects. The Feds just redistribute tax money. always has
been.
state ... what tho ?
just anyone who wants to is supposed to do what they reckon is right on
a bridge ?
or is their some kind of body in charge of the bridges ?
------> every state I know about has some kind of department of
transportation. In California its called CalTrans. In Mississippi it's
called MDOT, for example. These departments are in charge of maintaining
state roads, bridges, and highway, and the intrastates. Counties are
responsible for county roads, cities are responsible for city streets.
.
who is charge of the departments ?
The states are in charge of the departments,
Just like they're in charge of the drinking water in every state.
Since bridges and drinking water are just about
the same thing.
last I saw , a state was an area marked out by borders ...
how is a chunk of land responsible for bridges ??
---> take a fucking civics class sometime and learn how things work, you
moron
Im LOVING seeing you dudes tiptoing around and avoiding having to say
"government" here
--->STATE government, you moron
its the government that carries the can , but you pissfart around finger
pointing and tiptoing to protect yer fucking precious politicians ...
--- > have you EVER read the Constitution? You DO know the difference
between STATE and FEDERAL (and LOCAL, for that matter)
government is government , to argue more than that , is to bicker over
depth , shade and flavor of shit ... its all the same shit tho ..
Post by Myal
---> moron
why ?
Post by z***@netscape.net
Post by Myal
where does their funding come from ?- Hide quoted text -
- Show quoted text -
Hhhhmmmmm.....
2007-08-10 16:20:20 UTC
Permalink
Post by Myal
Post by z***@netscape.net
Post by Myal
Post by Myal
Post by Bob Brock
Post by Too_Many_Tools
Post by Red
Bullshit deleted.
What kind of whiny babies are these liberal idiots? They want the
POTUS to have his finger in every pie and his hand patting every back
so that they can blame every negative incident on him. Yet, when POTUS
tries to spy on terrorists and gangsters, they cry that their freedom
is being infringed. Do they want a Nanny state or a free state, or
does it depend on if POTUS is riding an elephant or a jackasss.
Actually his comments are more true than you want to admit.
Any politician visit is carefully orchestrated...especially a
President's...and especially a President's whose popularity is at
RECORD LOWS.....especially during an election cycle for the White
House.
And of course with the BILLIONS being wasted in Iraq instead of being
used to rebuild infrastructure in the United States, President Bush is
very guilty in contributing to this disaster.
---->. huh?
Yeah I know it's tough
-----> what mistake? just WHO do you think is responsible for maintaining
highways, bridges, roads in this country?
Not to defend Bush, but neglecting infrasturcture started before he got in
office. It just continued after he got in.
-----> it is a STATE responsibility - to inspect, maintain, manage
infrastructure projects. The Feds just redistribute tax money. always has
been.
state ... what tho ?
just anyone who wants to is supposed to do what they reckon is right on
a bridge ?
or is their some kind of body in charge of the bridges ?
------> every state I know about has some kind of department of
transportation. In California its called CalTrans. In Mississippi it's
called MDOT, for example. These departments are in charge of maintaining
state roads, bridges, and highway, and the intrastates. Counties are
responsible for county roads, cities are responsible for city streets.
.
who is charge of the departments ?
The states are in charge of the departments,
Just like they're in charge of the drinking water in every state.
Since bridges and drinking water are just about
the same thing.
last I saw , a state was an area marked out by borders ...
how is a chunk of land responsible for bridges ??
---> take a fucking civics class sometime and learn how things work, you
moron
Im LOVING seeing you dudes tiptoing around and avoiding having to say
"government" here
--->STATE government, you moron
its the government that carries the can , but you pissfart around finger
pointing and tiptoing to protect yer fucking precious politicians ...
--- > have you EVER read the Constitution? You DO know the difference
between STATE and FEDERAL (and LOCAL, for that matter)
government is government , to argue more than that , is to bicker over
depth , shade and flavor of shit ... its all the same shit tho ..

---> take a civics class, moron. open your mind and LEARN something.

-----> fucking idiots dont even have a klew what this country is or how it
works. READ the fucking CONSITUTION, you
moron!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Post by Myal
---> moron
why ?
Post by z***@netscape.net
Post by Myal
where does their funding come from ?- Hide quoted text -
- Show quoted text -
Myal
2007-08-10 23:06:36 UTC
Permalink
Post by Myal
Post by Myal
Post by z***@netscape.net
Post by Myal
Post by Myal
Post by Bob Brock
Post by Too_Many_Tools
Post by Red
Bullshit deleted.
What kind of whiny babies are these liberal idiots? They want the
POTUS to have his finger in every pie and his hand patting every back
so that they can blame every negative incident on him. Yet, when POTUS
tries to spy on terrorists and gangsters, they cry that their freedom
is being infringed. Do they want a Nanny state or a free state, or
does it depend on if POTUS is riding an elephant or a jackasss.
Actually his comments are more true than you want to admit.
Any politician visit is carefully orchestrated...especially a
President's...and especially a President's whose popularity is at
RECORD LOWS.....especially during an election cycle for the White
House.
And of course with the BILLIONS being wasted in Iraq instead of being
used to rebuild infrastructure in the United States, President Bush is
very guilty in contributing to this disaster.
---->. huh?
Yeah I know it's tough
-----> what mistake? just WHO do you think is responsible for maintaining
highways, bridges, roads in this country?
Not to defend Bush, but neglecting infrasturcture started before he got in
office. It just continued after he got in.
-----> it is a STATE responsibility - to inspect, maintain, manage
infrastructure projects. The Feds just redistribute tax money. always has
been.
state ... what tho ?
just anyone who wants to is supposed to do what they reckon is right on
a bridge ?
or is their some kind of body in charge of the bridges ?
------> every state I know about has some kind of department of
transportation. In California its called CalTrans. In Mississippi it's
called MDOT, for example. These departments are in charge of maintaining
state roads, bridges, and highway, and the intrastates. Counties are
responsible for county roads, cities are responsible for city streets.
.
who is charge of the departments ?
The states are in charge of the departments,
Just like they're in charge of the drinking water in every state.
Since bridges and drinking water are just about
the same thing.
last I saw , a state was an area marked out by borders ...
how is a chunk of land responsible for bridges ??
---> take a fucking civics class sometime and learn how things work, you
moron
Im LOVING seeing you dudes tiptoing around and avoiding having to say
"government" here
--->STATE government, you moron
its the government that carries the can , but you pissfart around finger
pointing and tiptoing to protect yer fucking precious politicians ...
--- > have you EVER read the Constitution? You DO know the difference
between STATE and FEDERAL (and LOCAL, for that matter)
government is government , to argue more than that , is to bicker over
depth , shade and flavor of shit ... its all the same shit tho ..
---> take a civics class, moron. open your mind and LEARN something.
-----> fucking idiots dont even have a klew what this country is or how it
works. READ the fucking CONSITUTION, you
moron!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
you seem serious , that you desire I should descend to your level of
bickering over shit ?

no thanks
Post by Myal
Post by Myal
---> moron
why ?
Post by z***@netscape.net
Post by Myal
where does their funding come from ?- Hide quoted text -
- Show quoted text -
Hhhhmmmmm.....
2007-08-16 15:42:34 UTC
Permalink
Post by Myal
Post by Myal
Post by z***@netscape.net
Post by Myal
Post by Myal
Post by Bob Brock
Post by Too_Many_Tools
Post by Red
Bullshit deleted.
What kind of whiny babies are these liberal idiots? They want the
POTUS to have his finger in every pie and his hand patting every back
so that they can blame every negative incident on him. Yet, when POTUS
tries to spy on terrorists and gangsters, they cry that their freedom
is being infringed. Do they want a Nanny state or a free state, or
does it depend on if POTUS is riding an elephant or a jackasss.
Actually his comments are more true than you want to admit.
Any politician visit is carefully orchestrated...especially a
President's...and especially a President's whose popularity is at
RECORD LOWS.....especially during an election cycle for the White
House.
And of course with the BILLIONS being wasted in Iraq instead of being
used to rebuild infrastructure in the United States, President Bush is
very guilty in contributing to this disaster.
---->. huh?
Yeah I know it's tough
-----> what mistake? just WHO do you think is responsible for maintaining
highways, bridges, roads in this country?
Not to defend Bush, but neglecting infrasturcture started before he
got
in
office. It just continued after he got in.
-----> it is a STATE responsibility - to inspect, maintain, manage
infrastructure projects. The Feds just redistribute tax money. always has
been.
state ... what tho ?
just anyone who wants to is supposed to do what they reckon is right on
a bridge ?
or is their some kind of body in charge of the bridges ?
------> every state I know about has some kind of department of
transportation. In California its called CalTrans. In Mississippi it's
called MDOT, for example. These departments are in charge of maintaining
state roads, bridges, and highway, and the intrastates. Counties are
responsible for county roads, cities are responsible for city streets.
.
who is charge of the departments ?
The states are in charge of the departments,
Just like they're in charge of the drinking water in every state.
Since bridges and drinking water are just about
the same thing.
last I saw , a state was an area marked out by borders ...
how is a chunk of land responsible for bridges ??
---> take a fucking civics class sometime and learn how things work, you
moron
Im LOVING seeing you dudes tiptoing around and avoiding having to say
"government" here
--->STATE government, you moron
its the government that carries the can , but you pissfart around finger
pointing and tiptoing to protect yer fucking precious politicians ...
--- > have you EVER read the Constitution? You DO know the difference
between STATE and FEDERAL (and LOCAL, for that matter)
government is government , to argue more than that , is to bicker over
depth , shade and flavor of shit ... its all the same shit tho ..
---> take a civics class, moron. open your mind and LEARN something.
-----> fucking idiots dont even have a klew what this country is or how it
works. READ the fucking CONSITUTION, you
moron!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
you seem serious , that you desire I should descend to your level of
bickering over shit ?

no thanks

---------> in other words, you refuse to educate yourself about how things
work in this nation. You prefer to accept the leftist nonsense that
permeates the internet, the media, etc.


---------> another ignoramus revealed. Bush is responsible for everything
end of story.

-----> you are yet one more reason why you people need to be excluded from
any decision making capacity.
.
Post by Myal
Post by Myal
---> moron
why ?
Post by z***@netscape.net
Post by Myal
where does their funding come from ?- Hide quoted text -
- Show quoted text -
Myal
2007-08-16 23:05:13 UTC
Permalink
Post by Myal
Post by Myal
Post by Myal
Post by z***@netscape.net
Post by Myal
Post by Myal
Post by Bob Brock
Post by Too_Many_Tools
Post by Red
Bullshit deleted.
What kind of whiny babies are these liberal idiots? They want the
POTUS to have his finger in every pie and his hand patting every back
so that they can blame every negative incident on him. Yet, when POTUS
tries to spy on terrorists and gangsters, they cry that their freedom
is being infringed. Do they want a Nanny state or a free state, or
does it depend on if POTUS is riding an elephant or a jackasss.
Actually his comments are more true than you want to admit.
Any politician visit is carefully orchestrated...especially a
President's...and especially a President's whose popularity is at
RECORD LOWS.....especially during an election cycle for the White
House.
And of course with the BILLIONS being wasted in Iraq instead of being
used to rebuild infrastructure in the United States, President Bush is
very guilty in contributing to this disaster.
---->. huh?
Yeah I know it's tough
-----> what mistake? just WHO do you think is responsible for maintaining
highways, bridges, roads in this country?
Not to defend Bush, but neglecting infrasturcture started before he
got
in
office. It just continued after he got in.
-----> it is a STATE responsibility - to inspect, maintain, manage
infrastructure projects. The Feds just redistribute tax money. always has
been.
state ... what tho ?
just anyone who wants to is supposed to do what they reckon is right on
a bridge ?
or is their some kind of body in charge of the bridges ?
------> every state I know about has some kind of department of
transportation. In California its called CalTrans. In Mississippi it's
called MDOT, for example. These departments are in charge of maintaining
state roads, bridges, and highway, and the intrastates. Counties are
responsible for county roads, cities are responsible for city streets.
.
who is charge of the departments ?
The states are in charge of the departments,
Just like they're in charge of the drinking water in every state.
Since bridges and drinking water are just about
the same thing.
last I saw , a state was an area marked out by borders ...
how is a chunk of land responsible for bridges ??
---> take a fucking civics class sometime and learn how things work, you
moron
Im LOVING seeing you dudes tiptoing around and avoiding having to say
"government" here
--->STATE government, you moron
its the government that carries the can , but you pissfart around finger
pointing and tiptoing to protect yer fucking precious politicians ...
--- > have you EVER read the Constitution? You DO know the difference
between STATE and FEDERAL (and LOCAL, for that matter)
government is government , to argue more than that , is to bicker over
depth , shade and flavor of shit ... its all the same shit tho ..
---> take a civics class, moron. open your mind and LEARN something.
-----> fucking idiots dont even have a klew what this country is or how it
works. READ the fucking CONSITUTION, you
moron!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
you seem serious , that you desire I should descend to your level of
bickering over shit ?
no thanks
---------> in other words, you refuse to educate yourself about how things
work in this nation. You prefer to accept the leftist nonsense that
permeates the internet, the media, etc.
---------> another ignoramus revealed. Bush is responsible for everything
end of story.
-----> you are yet one more reason why you people need to be excluded from
any decision making capacity.
your name calling ability as well as inability to read headers is noted
and laughed at

feel free to continue ranting about shade n depth tho
Post by Myal
.
Post by Myal
Post by Myal
---> moron
why ?
Post by z***@netscape.net
Post by Myal
where does their funding come from ?- Hide quoted text -
- Show quoted text -
Hhhhmmmmm.....
2007-08-19 11:53:44 UTC
Permalink
Post by Myal
Post by Myal
Post by Myal
Post by z***@netscape.net
Post by Myal
Post by Myal
Post by Bob Brock
Post by Too_Many_Tools
Post by Red
Bullshit deleted.
What kind of whiny babies are these liberal idiots? They want the
POTUS to have his finger in every pie and his hand patting every back
so that they can blame every negative incident on him. Yet, when POTUS
tries to spy on terrorists and gangsters, they cry that their freedom
is being infringed. Do they want a Nanny state or a free state, or
does it depend on if POTUS is riding an elephant or a jackasss.
Actually his comments are more true than you want to admit.
Any politician visit is carefully orchestrated...especially a
President's...and especially a President's whose popularity is at
RECORD LOWS.....especially during an election cycle for the White
House.
And of course with the BILLIONS being wasted in Iraq instead of being
used to rebuild infrastructure in the United States, President Bush is
very guilty in contributing to this disaster.
---->. huh?
Yeah I know it's tough
-----> what mistake? just WHO do you think is responsible for maintaining
highways, bridges, roads in this country?
Not to defend Bush, but neglecting infrasturcture started before he
got
in
office. It just continued after he got in.
-----> it is a STATE responsibility - to inspect, maintain, manage
infrastructure projects. The Feds just redistribute tax money.
always
has
been.
state ... what tho ?
just anyone who wants to is supposed to do what they reckon is right on
a bridge ?
or is their some kind of body in charge of the bridges ?
------> every state I know about has some kind of department of
transportation. In California its called CalTrans. In Mississippi it's
called MDOT, for example. These departments are in charge of maintaining
state roads, bridges, and highway, and the intrastates. Counties are
responsible for county roads, cities are responsible for city streets.
.
who is charge of the departments ?
The states are in charge of the departments,
Just like they're in charge of the drinking water in every state.
Since bridges and drinking water are just about
the same thing.
last I saw , a state was an area marked out by borders ...
how is a chunk of land responsible for bridges ??
---> take a fucking civics class sometime and learn how things work, you
moron
Im LOVING seeing you dudes tiptoing around and avoiding having to say
"government" here
--->STATE government, you moron
its the government that carries the can , but you pissfart around finger
pointing and tiptoing to protect yer fucking precious politicians ...
--- > have you EVER read the Constitution? You DO know the difference
between STATE and FEDERAL (and LOCAL, for that matter)
government is government , to argue more than that , is to bicker over
depth , shade and flavor of shit ... its all the same shit tho ..
---> take a civics class, moron. open your mind and LEARN something.
-----> fucking idiots dont even have a klew what this country is or how it
works. READ the fucking CONSITUTION, you
moron!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
you seem serious , that you desire I should descend to your level of
bickering over shit ?
no thanks
---------> in other words, you refuse to educate yourself about how things
work in this nation. You prefer to accept the leftist nonsense that
permeates the internet, the media, etc.
---------> another ignoramus revealed. Bush is responsible for everything
end of story.
-----> you are yet one more reason why you people need to be excluded from
any decision making capacity.
your name calling ability as well as inability to read headers is noted
and laughed at

feel free to continue ranting about shade n depth tho

---> yeah yeah whatever. you blame Bush for everything. You have no klew how
things work in this country. You dont read the regualr news in which each
and every state in this country takes responsibility for bridge inspection.
you refuse to understand that states and local government hire private
enterprise to fulfill. yada yada

---> end of story
Post by Myal
.
Post by Myal
Post by Myal
---> moron
why ?
Post by z***@netscape.net
Post by Myal
where does their funding come from ?- Hide quoted text -
- Show quoted text -
Myal
2007-08-19 16:41:47 UTC
Permalink
Post by Myal
Post by Myal
Post by Myal
Post by Myal
Post by z***@netscape.net
Post by Myal
Post by Myal
Post by Bob Brock
Post by Too_Many_Tools
Post by Red
Bullshit deleted.
What kind of whiny babies are these liberal idiots? They want the
POTUS to have his finger in every pie and his hand patting every back
so that they can blame every negative incident on him. Yet, when POTUS
tries to spy on terrorists and gangsters, they cry that their freedom
is being infringed. Do they want a Nanny state or a free state, or
does it depend on if POTUS is riding an elephant or a jackasss.
Actually his comments are more true than you want to admit.
Any politician visit is carefully orchestrated...especially a
President's...and especially a President's whose popularity is at
RECORD LOWS.....especially during an election cycle for the White
House.
And of course with the BILLIONS being wasted in Iraq instead of being
used to rebuild infrastructure in the United States, President Bush is
very guilty in contributing to this disaster.
---->. huh?
Yeah I know it's tough
-----> what mistake? just WHO do you think is responsible for maintaining
highways, bridges, roads in this country?
Not to defend Bush, but neglecting infrasturcture started before he
got
in
office. It just continued after he got in.
-----> it is a STATE responsibility - to inspect, maintain, manage
infrastructure projects. The Feds just redistribute tax money.
always
has
been.
state ... what tho ?
just anyone who wants to is supposed to do what they reckon is right on
a bridge ?
or is their some kind of body in charge of the bridges ?
------> every state I know about has some kind of department of
transportation. In California its called CalTrans. In Mississippi it's
called MDOT, for example. These departments are in charge of maintaining
state roads, bridges, and highway, and the intrastates. Counties are
responsible for county roads, cities are responsible for city streets.
.
who is charge of the departments ?
The states are in charge of the departments,
Just like they're in charge of the drinking water in every state.
Since bridges and drinking water are just about
the same thing.
last I saw , a state was an area marked out by borders ...
how is a chunk of land responsible for bridges ??
---> take a fucking civics class sometime and learn how things work, you
moron
Im LOVING seeing you dudes tiptoing around and avoiding having to say
"government" here
--->STATE government, you moron
its the government that carries the can , but you pissfart around finger
pointing and tiptoing to protect yer fucking precious politicians ...
--- > have you EVER read the Constitution? You DO know the difference
between STATE and FEDERAL (and LOCAL, for that matter)
government is government , to argue more than that , is to bicker over
depth , shade and flavor of shit ... its all the same shit tho ..
---> take a civics class, moron. open your mind and LEARN something.
-----> fucking idiots dont even have a klew what this country is or how it
works. READ the fucking CONSITUTION, you
moron!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
you seem serious , that you desire I should descend to your level of
bickering over shit ?
no thanks
---------> in other words, you refuse to educate yourself about how things
work in this nation. You prefer to accept the leftist nonsense that
permeates the internet, the media, etc.
---------> another ignoramus revealed. Bush is responsible for everything
end of story.
-----> you are yet one more reason why you people need to be excluded from
any decision making capacity.
your name calling ability as well as inability to read headers is noted
and laughed at
feel free to continue ranting about shade n depth tho
---> yeah yeah whatever. you blame Bush for everything.
*you* brung bush into it , Im willing to let every government thaat held
power since the bridge was found to be structuraly deficient share
responsibility

but if you feel bush IS your government , it does indeed explain your
need to diferentiate between color and shade of shit


You have no klew how
Post by Myal
things work in this country. You dont read the regualr news in which each
and every state in this country takes responsibility for bridge inspection.
you refuse to understand that states and local government hire private
enterprise to fulfill. yada yada
---> end of story
Post by Myal
.
Post by Myal
Post by Myal
---> moron
why ?
Post by z***@netscape.net
Post by Myal
where does their funding come from ?- Hide quoted text -
- Show quoted text -
Gunner Asch
2007-08-05 00:34:12 UTC
Permalink
On Fri, 3 Aug 2007 18:29:53 -0500, "Hhhhmmmmm....."
Post by Too_Many_Tools
Any politician visit is carefully orchestrated...especially a
President's...and especially a President's whose popularity is at
RECORD LOWS.....especially during an election cycle for the White
House.
Considering that the Democrat Congress's popularity is also at a
record low..perhaps they shouldnt send any congress critters on a
junket?

Gunner
Marion Morrison
2007-08-03 02:05:57 UTC
Permalink
Post by Red
Bullshit deleted.
What kind of whiny babies are these liberal idiots? They want the
POTUS to have his finger in every pie and his hand patting every back
so that they can blame every negative incident on him. Yet, when POTUS
tries to spy on terrorists and gangsters, they cry that their freedom
is being infringed. Do they want a Nanny state or a free state, or
does it depend on if POTUS is riding an elephant or a jackasss.
U mad?
Red
2007-08-03 02:42:16 UTC
Permalink
Post by Marion Morrison
Post by Red
Bullshit deleted.
What kind of whiny babies are these liberal idiots? They want the
POTUS to have his finger in every pie and his hand patting every back
so that they can blame every negative incident on him. Yet, when POTUS
tries to spy on terrorists and gangsters, they cry that their freedom
is being infringed. Do they want a Nanny state or a free state, or
does it depend on if POTUS is riding an elephant or a jackasss.
U mad?
Which is it, Nanny or Free do you want?
Bob Brock
2007-08-03 03:05:19 UTC
Permalink
Post by Red
Post by Marion Morrison
Post by Red
Bullshit deleted.
What kind of whiny babies are these liberal idiots? They want the
POTUS to have his finger in every pie and his hand patting every back
so that they can blame every negative incident on him. Yet, when POTUS
tries to spy on terrorists and gangsters, they cry that their freedom
is being infringed. Do they want a Nanny state or a free state, or
does it depend on if POTUS is riding an elephant or a jackasss.
U mad?
Which is it, Nanny or Free do you want?
Well, crossing a bridge and being sure of getting to the other side of the
river would be nice.
Too_Many_Tools
2007-08-03 03:07:39 UTC
Permalink
Post by Bob Brock
Post by Red
Post by Marion Morrison
Post by Red
Bullshit deleted.
What kind of whiny babies are these liberal idiots? They want the
POTUS to have his finger in every pie and his hand patting every back
so that they can blame every negative incident on him. Yet, when POTUS
tries to spy on terrorists and gangsters, they cry that their freedom
is being infringed. Do they want a Nanny state or a free state, or
does it depend on if POTUS is riding an elephant or a jackasss.
U mad?
Which is it, Nanny or Free do you want?
Well, crossing a bridge and being sure of getting to the other side of the
river would be nice.
Now damn it Bob, there you go making sense again. LOL

TMT
Bob Brock
2007-08-03 03:25:59 UTC
Permalink
Post by Too_Many_Tools
Post by Bob Brock
Post by Red
Post by Marion Morrison
Post by Red
Bullshit deleted.
What kind of whiny babies are these liberal idiots? They want the
POTUS to have his finger in every pie and his hand patting every back
so that they can blame every negative incident on him. Yet, when POTUS
tries to spy on terrorists and gangsters, they cry that their freedom
is being infringed. Do they want a Nanny state or a free state, or
does it depend on if POTUS is riding an elephant or a jackasss.
U mad?
Which is it, Nanny or Free do you want?
Well, crossing a bridge and being sure of getting to the other side of the
river would be nice.
Now damn it Bob, there you go making sense again. LOL
I'm sure that someone will jump in shortly to tell me what an unresonable
expectation that is. ;-)
E***@spamblock.panix.com
2007-08-03 18:23:18 UTC
Permalink
Post by Red
Which is it, Nanny or Free do you want?
Neither, you dimwit.
--
The whole problem with the world is that fools and fanatics are always so
certain of themselves, but wiser people so full of doubts.
-- Bertrand Russel
Eat Crack
2007-08-03 00:03:37 UTC
Permalink
Post by Hugh Bychakakov
With his handlers cautiously, stealthily getting a feel for the mood
in Minneapolis prior to Bush's planned trip there
this Saturday(!) "to inspect the bridge disaster," Secret Service
operatives -- perhaps recalling the hateful, anti-Kennedy attitude
among Texans that accompanied the president's fateful, ill-advised
trip there in 1963 -- want to ensure as best they can that your White
House war criminal isn't met with ear-piercing boos and jeers as he
tries to play the "comforting father" role.
But with Katrina victims still suffering terribly after two years,
Bushie's speechwriters are working overtime to craft remarks that
might not seem to ingenuous. If that's at all possible, owning to
your Nincompoop-in-Chief's abysmal approval ratings.
The fact that Dumbya is going to Minnesota Saturday instead of earlier
is an indication that provisions will be made to keep protesters and
other administration-haters away from where he's to appear in that
Democratic stronghold.
As of this writing, Laura Bush is already on her way to Minneapolis.
She's not likely to be booed, however, and her presence will help the
Bushies gauge the leval of residents' hostility toward the worst
"president" in the history of the United States.
But it figures that if anyone can gain solace from a Bush visit, they
probably can also benefit from a lobotomy.
Bush will leave a steaming pile of shit on the Twin Cities like he did on
Baghdad and New Orleans.
Curly Surmudgeon
2007-08-05 23:05:10 UTC
Permalink
Post by Hugh Bychakakov
With his handlers cautiously, stealthily getting a feel for the mood
in Minneapolis prior to Bush's planned trip there
this Saturday(!) "to inspect the bridge disaster," Secret Service
operatives -- perhaps recalling the hateful, anti-Kennedy attitude
among Texans that accompanied the president's fateful, ill-advised
trip there in 1963 -- want to ensure as best they can that your White
House war criminal isn't met with ear-piercing boos and jeers as he
tries to play the "comforting father" role.
But with Katrina victims still suffering terribly after two years,
Bushie's speechwriters are working overtime to craft remarks that
might not seem to ingenuous. If that's at all possible, owning to
your Nincompoop-in-Chief's abysmal approval ratings.
The fact that Dumbya is going to Minnesota Saturday instead of earlier
is an indication that provisions will be made to keep protesters and
other administration-haters away from where he's to appear in that
Democratic stronghold.
As of this writing, Laura Bush is already on her way to Minneapolis.
She's not likely to be booed, however, and her presence will help the
Bushies gauge the leval of residents' hostility toward the worst
"president" in the history of the United States.
But it figures that if anyone can gain solace from a Bush visit, they
probably can also benefit from a lobotomy.
Perhaps people will finally begin to see the true cost of Bush's wars.
Our infrastructure is crumbling as is education and society. Who is going
to pay for Bush's debt?

-- Regards, Curly
------------------------------------------------------------------------
https://thegreen.stanleylieber.com
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Loading...